• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

XSLT <xsl:variable> Element

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    XSLT <xsl:variable> Element

    "Definition and Usage

    The <xsl:variable> element is used to declare a local or global variable.

    Note: The variable is global if it's declared as a top-level element, and local if it's declared within a template.

    Note: Once you have set a variable's value, you cannot change or modify that value!"

    Source: XSLT <xsl:variable> Element

    ---------------------------

    This is bloody DISfunctional, not functional language!

    #2
    But you can bind another variable with the same name.
    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

    Comment


      #3
      What does this have to do with house prices? Clearly should be in LR.
      Originally posted by MaryPoppins
      I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
      Originally posted by vetran
      Urine is quite nourishing

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by d000hg View Post
        Clearly should be in LR.


        FR

        Comment


          #5
          AtW, just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it's wrong.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
            AtW, just because you don't understand something doesn't mean it's wrong.
            True, however I'd like to call your attention to a complete and utter failure of functional languages in market space - how many programmers use proper procedural languages and how many use so-called "functional"?

            The reality is that these "functional" concepts are too mind-****ed to begin with, and in practical terms they actually make your life hell thus preventing from doing ones job effectively - these languages are disfunctional.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              True, however I'd like to call your attention to a complete and utter failure of functional languages in market space - how many programmers use proper procedural languages and how many use so-called "functional"?

              The reality is that these "functional" concepts are too mind-****ed to begin with, and in practical terms they actually make your life hell thus preventing from doing ones job effectively - these languages are disfunctional.
              They're used an awful lot. It's just you don't come across them.
              Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
              threadeds website, and here's my blog.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by threaded View Post
                They're used an awful lot. It's just you don't come across them.
                I'd estimate that less than 1% of total source code written in such "functional" languages.

                I'd also estimate that less than 0.00001% of actually valuable software is written in such "functional" languages.

                XSLT is probably the only one that sneaked in below radar and I deeply regret the moment I had to use it

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by atw View Post
                  xslt is probably the only one that sneaked in below radar and i deeply regret the moment i failed to understand it
                  ftfy

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by AtW View Post
                    I'd estimate that less than 1% of total source code written in such "functional" languages.

                    I'd also estimate that less than 0.00001% of actually valuable software is written in such "functional" languages.

                    XSLT is probably the only one that sneaked in below radar and I deeply regret the moment I had to use it
                    Forth is the language used in most devices in the world...

                    Most telephone systems either use functional programming or are in a constant state of being debugged.
                    Lots of aerospace, mostly ISVV.
                    Insanity: repeating the same actions, but expecting different results.
                    threadeds website, and here's my blog.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X