• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The Gul of Mexico is now a fire hazard

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    The Gul of Mexico is now a fire hazard

    oh dear!

    http://http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aBNgvb9TEqE4&pos=9

    Will BP actually survive this?
    I'm alright Jack

    #2
    Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
    Nope, they're going to be raped by the Yanks.

    Comment


      #3
      What really pi$$es me off is that this accident, like the Total Oil Depot fire and many othes are caused by the greed and cutting costs. In the Total disaster, by just one person on duty to check basic equipment would have prevented disaster. The BP disaster seems to be caused in a similar way where nobody was employed to check the safety features. Each piece of equipment was someone else’s responsibility.
      "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

      Comment


        #4
        I wonder if diver is there?
        "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
        - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Paddy View Post
          What really pi$$es me off is that this accident, like the Total Oil Depot fire and many othes are caused by the greed and cutting costs. In the Total disaster, by just one person on duty to check basic equipment would have prevented disaster. The BP disaster seems to be caused in a similar way where nobody was employed to check the safety features. Each piece of equipment was someone else’s responsibility.
          You dont know whether it was cost cutting that led to this disaster. Your assertation is an open ended cliche which suggests that no matter how much money is thrown at prevention in the event of an accident it will never be enough.
          An important point here is that it has happened on the doorstep of the USA as opposed to offshore Brazil, Angola and other remote parts of the world. This will force the Industry to look very closely at drilling offshore in deep waters/wells, and it will also make the worlds largest consumer of Oil look again at its own policies.
          Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Paddy View Post
            The BP disaster seems to be caused in a similar way where nobody was employed to check the safety features.
            As I understand it, once you've installed the blowout preventer it's not industry practice to ever check it again.

            Can't really blame BP for that, but I expect it to cost them a pretty penny.
            ‎"See, you think I give a tulip. Wrong. In fact, while you talk, I'm thinking; How can I give less of a tulip? That's why I look interested."

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
              As I understand it, once you've installed the blowout preventer it's not industry practice to ever check it again.

              Can't really blame BP for that, but I expect it to cost them a pretty penny.
              Even when it has a flat battery?
              "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

              Comment


                #8
                AIUI, the basic problem is that blowout preventers are designed to work with a certain strength of pipe (they have a pair of blades that are explosively released to cut through the pipe and block it if a sudden pressure surge is detected.) But being at 5000 feet, the pipe was too thick for the blades to cut through it! DOH!

                In fact there are two or three devices designed to do the same thing, and all of them failed for basically that reason - Nobody thought to strengthen them for the grade of pipe in use.
                Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by cojak View Post
                  I wonder if diver is there?
                  his pcg nomination indicates that he has been there.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I'm surprised there isn't a ready market for people going out and collecting oil off the surface.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X