As a non drinker surprisingly I do not support the proposed reduction in the legal alocohol blood level from 80 mg per 100ml of blood
to 50 mg per 100 ml of blood.
It's these figures they come up with; 168 lives saved in a year, or 303 after five years how can they employ such levels of exactitude? Ok, if we really want to save lives, why not cut the rate to zero? Why not ban anyone from getting behind the wheel who is not aged 25-70?
To me, this should be a balance between freedom and responsibility and the implementation of these proposals will further damage country pubs as the law abiding citizen who enjoys a couple of pints over the course of an evening before driving home will no longer venture out. The real villuin, the anti social lunatic who has had many drinks, will still continue to do so and will continue to be a menace.
to 50 mg per 100 ml of blood.
It's these figures they come up with; 168 lives saved in a year, or 303 after five years how can they employ such levels of exactitude? Ok, if we really want to save lives, why not cut the rate to zero? Why not ban anyone from getting behind the wheel who is not aged 25-70?
To me, this should be a balance between freedom and responsibility and the implementation of these proposals will further damage country pubs as the law abiding citizen who enjoys a couple of pints over the course of an evening before driving home will no longer venture out. The real villuin, the anti social lunatic who has had many drinks, will still continue to do so and will continue to be a menace.
Comment