• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Blair rejected by Bush

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Blair rejected by Bush

    Seems that Blair is a PM with a great future behind him , even GW Bush has given him the cold shoulder ...


    ROLLS Royce, Britain’s aero engine maker, and General Electric of America, are reported to have lost out on a multi-billion dollar contract to supply engines for America’s F-35 joint strike fighter after Prime Minister Tony Blair’s appeals to President Bush were rejected.

    A Reuters report late Friday based on sources claiming close ties to defence contractors and the Pentagon, says Blair ended a video conference with Bush last week “empty-handed”.

    It is believed the Pentagon wants to kill the engine being developed by GE and Rolls-Royce.

    Under the Pentagon’s plans more than 2,400 F-35s would be built in three models for the US Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Britain’s Royal Navy.

    Rolls-Royce and General Electric won a $2.4bn (£1.4bn, E2bn) development contract from the Pentagon last July based on having a choice of two engines for the first batch of F-35s. The other engine is being developed by the American company Pratt & Whitney, a United Technologies unit.

    A spokesman at the White House would not confirm what was said between Blair and Bush in the discussions. “We don’t get into characterising those private conversations,” said Frederick Jones.

    Blair has raised the issue in two video conferences and in an earlierletter, confirmed Rhian Chilcott, head of the Washington office of the Confederation of British Industry, the industry group representing British firms such as Rolls-Royce.

    The Rolls-Royce/GE development contract was to run through to September 2013. It would have led to huge earnings from the sale of spares and maintenance of the engines over their projected 40-year life.

    The Pentagon plans to spend some $256bn, its biggest purchase, on the radar-evading, single-seat F-35 being developed by Lockheed Martin.

    #2
    Ah well, at least the Indians still like him

    It's just a shame he doesn't **** off to somewhere that they do like him....
    Why not?

    Comment


      #3
      Maybe BennO can put him up

      Comment


        #4
        Why the F$$K anyone would expect to be winning contracts due to "relationship" between leaders? It is certainly out of Bush's hands, he'd get impeached for this sort of crap, so no wonder his advisors told him not to interfere.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by AtW
          Why the F$$K anyone would expect to be winning contracts due to "relationship" between leaders? It is certainly out of Bush's hands, he'd get impeached for this sort of crap, so no wonder his advisors told him not to interfere.
          Atw

          It was the same relationship that sent our armed forces to Afghanistan and Iraq, certainly Bush could have influenced the decision without risking impeachement.

          Looks as if Tonys Shoulder To Shoulder statement was a one way street.

          Another failure from Blair.

          Comment


            #6
            Tell him we'll pull out of Iraq if he doesn't give us the 'kin contract.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by PerlOfWisdom
              Tell him we'll pull out of Iraq if he doesn't give us the 'kin contract.
              This kind of stuff won't work and quiet rightly so.

              All those contract competitions have rules and I am pretty sure its a serious offence for politicians like Bush to interfere, its illegal and also his american buddies want contracts even more badly.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
                Atw

                It was the same relationship that sent our armed forces to Afghanistan and Iraq, certainly Bush could have influenced the decision without risking impeachement.

                Looks as if Tonys Shoulder To Shoulder statement was a one way street.

                Another failure from Blair.
                And look at the sh1t being thrown at Tony by goons like you

                Mailman

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by AtW
                  This kind of stuff won't work and quiet rightly so.

                  All those contract competitions have rules and I am pretty sure its a serious offence for politicians like Bush to interfere, its illegal and also his american buddies want contracts even more badly.
                  So then Atw How do you think Harliburton managed to get all those Iraq contracts and a few where there was no other competing bids allowed ?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock
                    So then Atw How do you think Harliburton managed to get all those Iraq contracts and a few where there was no other competing bids allowed ?
                    The keyword was "no other competing bids", they won by default - and its okay for US politician to lobby US company, but clearly not okay to do so for a foreign company - Tony Blair has no right to make political contributions for next elections there

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X