• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Truth Will Out: Wikileaks Publishes 90,000+ Afghan War Documents

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Truth Will Out: Wikileaks Publishes 90,000+ Afghan War Documents

    Afghan War Diary, 2004-2010 - WikiLeaks

    The Grauniad has created an Excel spreadsheet, which you can download:
    It must be one of the biggest leaks in intelligence history. An archive of almost 90,000 files has come to light thanks to Wikileaks, logging the history of the war in Afghanistan, practically blow-by-blow. We've trawled through these incidents to help you make sense of the key events.

    We have reproduced full military logs behind more than 200 of the key events from the database – you can navigate around them. But if you want to download this data to play with it yourself, this is the place to come.

    These detailed reports show coalition forces' attacks on civilians, friendly fire incidents and Afghan forces attacking each other – so-called green on green.

    Mash Up or Shut Up
    Last edited by NickFitz; 26 July 2010, 05:29. Reason: FFS, typo in the title? Amateur ;-)

    #2
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
    Afghan War Diary, 2004-2010 - WikiLeaks

    The Grauniad has created an Excel spreadsheet, which you can download:
    It must be one of the biggest leaks in intelligence history. An archive of almost 90,000 files has come to light thanks to Wikileaks, logging the history of the war in Afghanistan, practically blow-by-blow. We've trawled through these incidents to help you make sense of the key events.

    We have reproduced full military logs behind more than 200 of the key events from the database – you can navigate around them. But if you want to download this data to play with it yourself, this is the place to come.

    These detailed reports show coalition forces' attacks on civilians, friendly fire incidents and Afghan forces attacking each other – so-called green on green.
    Mash Up or Shut Up
    The reports also show collusion between the Pakistani armed forces/Government and the Taliban.

    More than enough ammunition to permit the Yanks to blow the 3rd world piss-ant country off the face of the planet.

    Comment


      #3
      No surprise that the US is furious at Wikileaks
      Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
        More than enough ammunition to permit the Yanks to blow the 3rd world piss-ant country off the face of the planet.
        Pakistan and weapons of mass destruction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

        Current stockpile 70-90 nuclear warheads
        (2009 estimate) [2][3]

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by SupremeSpod View Post
          The reports also show collusion between the Pakistani armed forces/Government and the Taliban.

          More than enough ammunition to permit the Yanks to blow the 3rd world piss-ant country off the face of the planet.
          Steady on there fella - it's not all that clear cut.

          I'm no fan of the country (Pakistan) but believe there are significant rogue elements within the ISI who are using the Afghan war to further their own aims - mainly due to money.

          The amount of money being pumped into the conflict is massive and it suits these individuals to prolong the US occupancy for as long as possible.

          I wouldn't be surprised if there is some un-official govt, involvement as well but, let's be honest, most govts would look to further their own interests, where possible, under the same circumstances.

          This sums it up well:

          A retired senior American officer said ground-level reports were considered to be a mixture of "rumours, bulltulip and second-hand information" and were weeded out as they passed up the chain of command. "As someone who had to sift through thousands of these reports, I can say that the chances of finding any real information are pretty slim," said the officer, who has years of experience in the region.

          If anything, the jumble of allegations highlights the perils of collecting accurate intelligence in a complex arena where all sides have an interest in distorting the truth.

          "The fog of war is particularly dense in Afghanistan," said Michael Semple, a former deputy head of the EU mission there. "A barrage of false information is being passed off as intelligence and anyone who wants to operate there needs to be able to sift through it. The opportunities to be misled are innumerable."

          Source.

          Comment


            #6
            So did anyone ever find out what we are doing in Afghanistan?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
              So did anyone ever find out what we are doing in Afghanistan?
              Afghan women before US and UK interference



              Afghan women after US and UK interference



              During the 1980s Afghanistan had free health and education for all. Women had equal rights. The down side was the government were pro-USSR. This evil regime were brought down by the UK and USA who sponsored the Mujahdeen who in turn overthrew the Afghan government.
              Last edited by Paddy; 26 July 2010, 12:47.
              "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Paddy View Post
                This evil regime were brought down by the UK and USA who sponsored the Mujahdeen who in turn overthrew the Afghan government.
                You seem to confuse the Mujahadeen with the Taliban - and you seem to confuse the UK with the US.

                Understandable I suppose - if viewed from a distance.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Sysman View Post
                  No surprise that the US is furious at Wikileaks
                  We are sure they say they are...

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by contractorcontractor View Post
                    You seem to confuse the Mujahadeen with the Taliban - and you seem to confuse the UK with the US.

                    Understandable I suppose - if viewed from a distance.
                    No confusion, Mujahideen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                    Please go and read some history and then make a posting. Both the UK and US were openly sending arms and money to the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. The Taliban was the name given by the west.
                    "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X