• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

More RAF jets set for Afghanistan

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    More RAF jets set for Afghanistan

    Whole

    TWO (2)

    jets sent to support ground operations!!!

    Source: BBC News - Two more RAF Tornado jets to be sent to Afghanistan

    FFS, send 200 airplanes and helicopters to support your forces, or 2000 if necessary to get the job done - if you can't then don't get involved then in the first place.

    FFS:

    "Dr Fox said: "The deployment of these two extra aircraft is another illustration of the UK government's commitment to achieving success in operations in Afghanistan."



    Maybe he is right here - 2 aircraft actually is another illustration of Govts commitment.

    "The following is a partial and unofficial list of helicopter and airplane crashes that occurred during the Soviet war in Afghanistan of 1979-89. In total, at least 333 helicopters and 118 jets crashed during the war.[1]"

    List of Soviet aircraft losses in Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - that's just those that crashed/got shot down. The total number of supporting Soviet forces were at least 3-5 times more or 1500 aircraft.



    #2
    No more blood for Hamid Karzai.

    Let the Hadjis mind their own business.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by markinbrussels View Post
      No more blood for Hamid Karzai.

      Let the Hadjis mind their own business.
      F**k off. Seriously. Your rantings are not even offensive any more, you're just a sad boring twat.

      Comment


        #4
        Afghanistan needs to be carpet bombed to bring them in to line. There is not point pussy footing around, use nukes if necessary.
        Last edited by Billy-Bob; 12 August 2010, 07:34.
        Never swap horses crossing a stream

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          Whole

          TWO (2)

          jets sent to support ground operations!!!

          Source: BBC News - Two more RAF Tornado jets to be sent to Afghanistan

          FFS, send 200 airplanes and helicopters to support your forces, or 2000 if necessary to get the job done - if you can't then don't get involved then in the first place.

          FFS:

          "Dr Fox said: "The deployment of these two extra aircraft is another illustration of the UK government's commitment to achieving success in operations in Afghanistan."



          Maybe he is right here - 2 aircraft actually is another illustration of Govts commitment.

          "The following is a partial and unofficial list of helicopter and airplane crashes that occurred during the Soviet war in Afghanistan of 1979-89. In total, at least 333 helicopters and 118 jets crashed during the war.[1]"

          List of Soviet aircraft losses in Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - that's just those that crashed/got shot down. The total number of supporting Soviet forces were at least 3-5 times more or 1500 aircraft.



          Listen here me old Ruski, 2 Tornados with Gibbons software in is worth twice the commitment of the pathetic Ruski one back in the eighties.

          HTH
          But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by AtW View Post
            Whole

            TWO (2)

            jets sent to support ground operations!!!

            Source: BBC News - Two more RAF Tornado jets to be sent to Afghanistan

            FFS, send 200 airplanes and helicopters to support your forces, or 2000 if necessary to get the job done - if you can't then don't get involved then in the first place.

            FFS:

            "Dr Fox said: "The deployment of these two extra aircraft is another illustration of the UK government's commitment to achieving success in operations in Afghanistan."



            Maybe he is right here - 2 aircraft actually is another illustration of Govts commitment.

            "The following is a partial and unofficial list of helicopter and airplane crashes that occurred during the Soviet war in Afghanistan of 1979-89. In total, at least 333 helicopters and 118 jets crashed during the war.[1]"

            List of Soviet aircraft losses in Afghanistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - that's just those that crashed/got shot down. The total number of supporting Soviet forces were at least 3-5 times more or 1500 aircraft.


            "Armchair General" drivel. It's not just a question of 'sending more' planes. You have to have the personnel to fly, navigate, service and maintain them. You'll need sufficient fuel to fly them, and stocks of armaments to make flying them worth while, as well as appropriate levels of stock of essential spares. They'll also need hangar space/dispersal areas to protect them from drive-by AK47 fire and/or RPGs. All this coupled with the fact that in what is, essentially, a guerrilla war, airpower is of limited strategic use. On the face of it an additional 2 aircraft sounds about right.
            The vegetarian option.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by wobbegong View Post
              "Armchair General" drivel. It's not just a question of 'sending more' planes. You have to have the personnel to fly, navigate, service and maintain them. You'll need sufficient fuel to fly them, and stocks of armaments to make flying them worth while, as well as appropriate levels of stock of essential spares. They'll also need hangar space/dispersal areas to protect them from drive-by AK47 fire and/or RPGs. All this coupled with the fact that in what is, essentially, a guerrilla war, airpower is of limited strategic use. On the face of it an additional 2 aircraft sounds about right.
              WHS +++
              But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

              Comment

              Working...
              X