Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Seems perfectly reasonable to me, anyone disagree?
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
Anyone who's ever been to Switzerland knows how strict they are, so the guy deserves what he gets. He could have gone to Germany and been OK or gone to Italy and bribed the copper. Alternatively, he could have hired a race track for a day and really driven hard.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Under Swiss law, the level of fine is determined by the wealth of the driver and the speed recorded.
In which case, it seems fair... crippling someone financially is a bad idea but stripping wealth as a punishment for such blatant idiocy seems reasonable.
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson
Comment