PDA

View Full Version : Happy Climate Fool's Day



Boudica
27th October 2010, 13:52
hahaha this is funny, these people insult each other and have more trolls than us

Happy Climate Fools' Day – Telegraph Blogs (http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100060540/happy-climate-fools-day/)

buggering bugger put my apostrophe in the wrong place!!!

Mich the Tester
27th October 2010, 13:56
You've done a better job of parking that apostrophe than any woman could manage with a car.


oops...:igmc:

Boudica
27th October 2010, 13:59
You've done a better job of parking that apostrophe than any woman could manage with a car.


oops...:igmc:

ha bloody ha

TykeMerc
27th October 2010, 14:06
I enjoyed that article immensely :D

sasguru
27th October 2010, 14:27
I enjoyed that article immensely :D

The credibility of the author is destroyed by this piece of nonsense however:

"I know what you’re thinking and I’ve heard about the “consensus” too. But when you can actually prove something you don’t need a consensus. That’s why you never hear about the consensus on gravity, or the consensus on evolution."

:laugh:laugh:laugh

Although I'm sure ignorant cretins like SB don't see what is wrong with that statement at all.

:rollin:

BlasterBates
27th October 2010, 14:27
I did read somewhere that the several billion Germany had spent on it's renewables would delay global warming by 2 minutes.

:laugh

hyperD
27th October 2010, 14:44
Windmills.

Enough said.

hyperD
27th October 2010, 14:56
The credibility of the author is destroyed by this piece of nonsense however:

"...But when you can actually prove something you don’t need a consensus. That’s why you never hear about the consensus on gravity, or the consensus on evolution."


I agree. In the same sense as anyone in the AGW camp that emphatically states "the science is settled".

GreenLabel
27th October 2010, 15:15
I wasn't aware there was anybody left who still believed in this crap.

shaunbhoy
27th October 2010, 16:00
I wasn't aware there was anybody left who still believed in this crap.

There is. The gullible beanhead that is sasguru.
:laugh

EternalOptimist
27th October 2010, 16:20
The credibility of the author is destroyed by this piece of nonsense however:

"I know what you’re thinking and I’ve heard about the “consensus” too. But when you can actually prove something you don’t need a consensus. That’s why you never hear about the consensus on gravity, or the consensus on evolution."

:laugh:laugh:laugh

Although I'm sure ignorant cretins like SB don't see what is wrong with that statement at all.

:rollin:

What has concensus got to do with science ?? why are you laughing ?

There is no place in science for concensus, concensus is a political phrase and a political tool. Its a way for crooks to side-step debate
Science is about producing falsifiable theories, verifiable results and does not rely on a popularity contest.

the author of that piece was right, forget concensus, bring me the proof


pea brain



:rolleyes:

thunderlizard
27th October 2010, 16:24
anthropomorphic CO2

I'd pay to see that.

GreenLabel
27th October 2010, 16:25
What has concensus got to do with science ?? why are you laughing ?

There is no place in science for concensus, concensus is a political phrase and a political tool. Its a way for crooks to side-step debate
Science is about producing falsifiable theories, verifiable results and does not rely on a popularity contest.

the author of that piece was right, forget concensus, bring me the proof


pea brain



:rolleyes:


Consensus: What we use in lieu of proof. Anyone requesting proof of AGW should be referred to the sacred consensus.

* AGW Believers Manual, 3rd Edition, Appendix D: Glossary.

hyperD
27th October 2010, 16:29
anthropomorphic CO2 - I'd pay to see that.

:yay:

Spacecadet
27th October 2010, 16:39
anthropomorphic CO2
I'd pay to see that.

Its what comes out of the Soylent Green factory chimneys

Boudica
27th October 2010, 18:24
What has concensus got to do with science ?? why are you laughing ?

There is no place in science for concensus, concensus is a political phrase and a political tool. Its a way for crooks to side-step debate
Science is about producing falsifiable theories, verifiable results and does not rely on a popularity contest.

the author of that piece was right, forget concensus, bring me the proof


pea brain



:rolleyes:

pea brain!!!!

insult of the week!!!
:banana:

sasguru
27th October 2010, 18:52
What has concensus got to do with science ?? why are you laughing ?

There is no place in science for concensus, concensus is a political phrase and a political tool. Its a way for crooks to side-step debate
Science is about producing falsifiable theories, verifiable results and does not rely on a popularity contest.

the author of that piece was right, forget concensus, bring me the proof


pea brain



:rolleyes:

You really are very limited aren't you? And you don't even know it.

shaunbhoy
27th October 2010, 19:23
You really are very limited aren't you? And you don't even know it.

:tumble: :tumble: :tumble:

EternalOptimist
27th October 2010, 20:17
You really are very limited aren't you? And you don't even know it.

I'd rather be a hammer than a nail
yesss I woulld
oh yeeess I woooould
if I couuuld
I surely wouuulldd

I 'd rather be a fart in a hurricane
than a pea-brain

oh yes I woooood


if I coooould



:rolleyes: