• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Those fckng Fckrs

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Those fckng Fckrs

    I cant believe the fckng sh1te these fckng fckrs are fckng heaping on me.
    Theres a fckng field containing fckng balance, which is orders - deliveries, and a fckng fields on the fckng report called fckng balance. So the users pay for the fckng report and the fckng fcks here dont bother testing it, because its so fckng simple. But the fckng fck users meant something different, they fckng meant all future sh1t, which to me is fcng out fckng standing. So now the fckng pm says, 'isnt it obvious'
    well if it was fckng ovbious you fckng fck, i would have fckng done it propply in the first fckng place.

    fck me.


    (\__/)
    (>'.'<)
    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

    #2
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    I cant believe the fckng sh1te these fckng fckrs are fckng heaping on me.
    Theres a fckng field containing fckng balance, which is orders - deliveries, and a fckng fields on the fckng report called fckng balance. So the users pay for the fckng report and the fckng fcks here dont bother testing it, because its so fckng simple. But the fckng fck users meant something different, they fckng meant all future sh1t, which to me is fcng out fckng standing. So now the fckng pm says, 'isnt it obvious'
    well if it was fckng ovbious you fckng fck, i would have fckng done it propply in the first fckng place.

    fck me.



    Too many words without a fckng in there. Pull your socks up man.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
      fck me.
      Promise you won't change your mind half way through and accuse someone of rape?
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
        I cant believe the fckng sh1te these fckng fckrs are fckng heaping on me.
        Theres a fckng field containing fckng balance, which is orders - deliveries, and a fckng fields on the fckng report called fckng balance. So the users pay for the fckng report and the fckng fcks here dont bother testing it, because its so fckng simple. But the fckng fck users meant something different, they fckng meant all future sh1t, which to me is fcng out fckng standing. So now the fckng pm says, 'isnt it obvious'
        well if it was fckng ovbious you fckng fck, i would have fckng done it propply in the first fckng place.

        fck me.


        But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Gibbon View Post
          The quality of rants nowadays just aren't what they used to be.
          'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
            I cant believe the fckng sh1te these fckng fckrs are fckng heaping on me.
            Theres a fckng field containing fckng balance, which is orders - deliveries, and a fckng fields on the fckng report called fckng balance. So the users pay for the fckng report and the fckng fcks here dont bother testing it, because its so fckng simple. But the fckng fck users meant something different, they fckng meant all future sh1t, which to me is fcng out fckng standing. So now the fckng pm says, 'isnt it obvious'
            well if it was fckng ovbious you fckng fck, i would have fckng done it propply in the first fckng place.

            fck me.


            Can you fcking invoice? Then shut the fck up then.
            Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

            Comment


              #7
              Sounds like someone didn't gather the requirements properly.
              What happens in General, stays in General.
              You know what they say about assumptions!

              Comment


                #8
                yep

                or have a proper test plan and sign off procedure in place

                oh and as for the PM who said isn't it obvious you maybe want to ask him whether it should be an obvious part of his project to have testing and sign off procedures in place....

                either that or kick him down the stairs..

                Comment


                  #9
                  Don't you just love text speak.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by original PM View Post
                    yep

                    or have a proper test plan and sign off procedure in place

                    oh and as for the PM who said isn't it obvious you maybe want to ask him whether it should be an obvious part of his project to have testing and sign off procedures in place....

                    either that or kick him down the stairs..
                    Knock first as I might be balancing my chakras.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X