I cant believe the fckng sh1te these fckng fckrs are fckng heaping on me.
Theres a fckng field containing fckng balance, which is orders - deliveries, and a fckng fields on the fckng report called fckng balance. So the users pay for the fckng report and the fckng fcks here dont bother testing it, because its so fckng simple. But the fckng fck users meant something different, they fckng meant all future sh1t, which to me is fcng out fckng standing. So now the fckng pm says, 'isnt it obvious'
well if it was fckng ovbious you fckng fck, i would have fckng done it propply in the first fckng place.
fck me.
Theres a fckng field containing fckng balance, which is orders - deliveries, and a fckng fields on the fckng report called fckng balance. So the users pay for the fckng report and the fckng fcks here dont bother testing it, because its so fckng simple. But the fckng fck users meant something different, they fckng meant all future sh1t, which to me is fcng out fckng standing. So now the fckng pm says, 'isnt it obvious'
well if it was fckng ovbious you fckng fck, i would have fckng done it propply in the first fckng place.
fck me.
Comment