• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

GDP and margins of error

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    GDP and margins of error

    Is it really possible to state that the economy has 'grown by 0.2%' or 'shrunk by 0.3%'? Are the measurements really that accurate or is there some margin of error within which such statements are actually at best rather spekulative (sic) and at worst nonsense?
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    #2
    GDP is a load of boll0x: a moderately paid lawyers in London would contribute more to UKs GDP than dozens of railway engineers making thousands of miles of modern high speed railway in China.

    HTH

    Comment


      #3
      Isn't the headline a preliminary figure, which they sometimes adjust up or down later when more data comes in?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
        Isn't the headline a preliminary figure, which they sometimes adjust up or down later when more data comes in?
        But by how much do they adjust it? What is the bandwidth of these post-sorting-out-the-data corrections?
        And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
          Is it really possible to state that the economy has 'grown by 0.2%' or 'shrunk by 0.3%'? Are the measurements really that accurate or is there some margin of error within which such statements are actually at best rather spekulative (sic) and at worst nonsense?
          Well, 0.1% is about 1.5 billion pounds. I would hope they are accurate to the nearest billion or so.
          While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

          Comment


            #6
            If it looks good, it's completely accurate and the government is responsible. If it looks bad, there's a wide margin of error and it's due to factors outside the government's control, such as snow.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
              due to factors outside the government's control, such as snow.
              You think massive snow that closed airports at the end of last year did not have an effect?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by AtW View Post
                You think massive snow that closed airports at the end of last year did not have an effect?
                The Swedish economy grew by 5.2% in 2010. Clearly it never snows there

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
                  The Swedish economy grew by 5.2% in 2010. Clearly it never snows there
                  If they had ENOUGH snow to block roads at time of most sales it would have impact on their GDP.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
                    The Swedish economy grew by 5.2% in 2010. Clearly it never snows there
                    Might have somthing to do with the fact that a) the Nordic countries know what they are doing in snow b) they weren't wrecked by a twat called Gordon Brown and his bastard Labour party

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X