• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Compare and contrast - Scientists are always right all the time, never question

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Compare and contrast - Scientists are always right all the time, never question

    Then (when it didn't snow much):
    BBC NEWS | Scotland | 'Less snow and rain' for islands

    The amount of snow falling on Scotland's islands could drop by almost 90%, according to a report on global warming.

    On the rocks: the grim forecast for winter sports as global warming increases | World news | The Guardian

    Skiing and snowboarding may be Britain's fastest growing winter sports, but they could come to a muddy end this century as a lack of snow closes many of the world's top resorts, according to research published yesterday.
    Up to half of all Switzerland's ski resorts could face economic hardship or bankruptcy because of global warming, according to the UN environment programme, and low-altitude resorts in Italy, Germany and Austria may have to move uphill or face a snowless future. Others may have to rely on snow-making machines. US ski resorts face similar challenges, while Australia could have no skiing at all by 2070.

    Britain 'will gain from global warming' - Telegraph

    NORTHERN Europe will have fewer days of frost and snow and longer growing seasons because of global warming, according to a report published yesterday.

    Southern European resorts would become too hot in summer and the land would become arid, it added. The report, by 30 international scientists for the European Commission, said that Britain could expect more flooding but could benefit from a reduced need for heating and better growing conditions for trees and crops.


    Now (we've had some snow):

    Climate Change Makes Major Snowstorms More Likely | Union of Concerned Scientists

    Scientists: Global warming to blame for big U.S. snowstorms | The Burlington Free Press | Burlington, Vermont

    Bangkok Post : Global warming means more snowstorms: scientists



    So, Global Warming means no snow, and then when we have a lot of snow, it means, we will get a lot of snow.



    Is the amount of tax we are paying to control carbon making is snow more or less now?



    #2
    Any minute now someone with an IQ lower than a retarded cabbage will be along to tell you that you don't understand it all because you are a village idiot/cretin/moron/simpleton. You do know that don't you?
    “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
      Any minute now someone with an IQ lower than a retarded cabbage will be along to tell you that you don't understand it all because you are a village idiot/cretin/moron/simpleton. You do know that don't you?
      Yes, it's all about statistics.

      Statistically speaking, the scientists all said it would get very warm and hence no snow, because, well it hadn't snowed very much, and statistically speaking, if the world is getting hotter, snow would melt wouldn't it?

      But then ten years or so later it started snowing all over the world. A lot of snow, and so statistically speaking it was now snowing a lot more, so they are predicting a very hot world all covered in snow.

      Law of averages, 'innit.

      I'm just so glad all this Carbon tax has made it snow less/more* and helped mankind.

      Delete as appropriate.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
        Yes, it's all about statistics.

        Statistically speaking, the scientists all said it would get very warm and hence no snow, because, well it hadn't snowed very much, and statistically speaking, if the world is getting hotter, snow would melt wouldn't it?

        But then ten years or so later it started snowing all over the world. A lot of snow, and so statistically speaking it was now snowing a lot more, so they are predicting a very hot world all covered in snow.

        Law of averages, 'innit.

        I'm just so glad all this Carbon tax has made it snow less/more* and helped mankind.

        Delete as appropriate.

        Statistically speaking, they need to fabricate some more statistics before some more of the wheels fall off and even the uber-gullible chimps like sasguru begin to have doubts.

        “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by shaunbhoy View Post
          Statistically speaking, they need to fabricate some more statistics before some more of the wheels fall off and even the uber-gullible chimps like sasguru begin to have doubts.

          should climate predictions by scientists come with the disclaimer that past performance does not guarantee future performance, just like with those scammy stock and funds recommendations?

          haha - climate scientists are now equal to stock analysts - haha
          "Condoms should come with a free pack of earplugs."

          Comment


            #6
            Science is not exact hence the inappropiate use of the term atom.

            I detest that haughty certainess expressed by many of the scientific elite.
            But I discovered nothing else but depraved, excessive superstition. Pliny the younger

            Comment


              #7
              I see the retarded cabbage wannabe has started his own rival thread.

              So easy...............fish in barrel easy in fact.

              “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

              Comment


                #8
                Can anyone suggest a worthwhile alternative for science?
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Can anyone suggest a worthwhile alternative for science?
                  Shaken Chicken Bones..................statistically they can prove/disprove anything

                  HTH

                  sasguru
                  “The period of the disintegration of the European Union has begun. And the first vessel to have departed is Britain”

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Latest IPCC chart.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X