I run a small software business in central Japan. Over the years, I’ve worked both in the local Japanese government (as a translator) and in Japanese industry (as a systems engineer), and have some minor knowledge of how things are done here. English-language reporting on the matter has been so bad that my mother is worried for my safety, so in the interests of clearing the air I thought I would write up a bit of what I know.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Some Perspective On The Japan Earthquake
Collapse
X
-
Some Perspective On The Japan Earthquake
Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away. -
Originally posted by Sysman View Post
The instant response — scramming the reactors — happened exactly as planned and, instantly, removed the Apocalyptic Nightmare Scenarios from the table
Oh really ? -
Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View PostOh really ?
What they failed (in my view) to take into account is tsunami - it might have been convinient to place nuclear power stations near water that is necessary for them to not blow up even when they are "shutdown", but placing them so close to the shore that can be affected by tsunami seems reckless to me.
Frankly, why are those things not deep underground?Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostFrankly, why are those things not deep underground?While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'Comment
-
Originally posted by doodab View PostYes cos that's the best place to be in an earthquake. Deep underground with only a lift shaft to get you in and out.
Some meltdown in a nuclear plant is ok if its underground - after all they were blowing up nukes there and if that works for full blown explosion then it should work for nuclear plans, locating them near water (!) is crazy.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostNORAD command center was build inside mountain to withstand earthquakes and near direct hits of massive nukes.
Some meltdown in a nuclear plant is ok if its underground - after all they were blowing up nukes there and if that works for full blown explosion then it should work for nuclear plans, locating them near water (!) is crazy.Comment
-
Originally posted by PRC1964 View PostLocating them near water is what makes them safe in the first place.
Maybe it's entirely safe to build such a reactor in place of shaunbhoy's family house in Devon, but it sure ain't safe in place where that reactor had been.
Frankly this whole concept of "we'll shutdown plant in event of earthquake instantly" is total bulltulip - there is no proper on/off with such reactors, get some damage to water delivery and the whole thing blows - how is that a safe design?!?!Comment
-
Does anyone know how high the waves got at the Fukushima power plant where the failing reactors are located? Some chap on the TV said the diesel trucks got washed away, although other people are saying the room where the generators were kept was flooded. How bad did it get there?
At the end of the day all reactors failed through pump failure (for whatever underlying reason you might believe) and that's why modern designs don't have that feature, I gather.Comment
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostHow does locating a nuclear reactor in known earthquake zone where tsunamies are common is safe?
Maybe it's entirely safe to build such a reactor in place of shaunbhoy's family house in Devon, but it sure ain't safe in place where that reactor had been.
Frankly this whole concept of "we'll shutdown plant in event of earthquake instantly" is total bulltulip - there is no proper on/off with such reactors, get some damage to water delivery and the whole thing blows - how is that a safe design?!?!Comment
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostSo where do you propose to build them.
Using coal stations makes more sense - and if the Greens don't like it then they can live next to nuclear stationComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment