An embarassing incident at the gymnasium this evening cause me to reflect upon the state of modern underwear and concur with Jeremy Paxman's sentiments on this sensitive issue.
Upon returning from the shower to my locker, for some reason my swipe card was somehow rendered ineffective in the operation of opening the locker containing my clothing. Somewhat panic stricken, I realised with horror that this would mean going to the desk to ask one of the 2 teenage girls on duty to give me an emergency card in order that I might liberate my apparel from said locker.
Now, I know what you're thinking, but it wasn't as bad as it could have been because I was attired in my trusty Marks and Sparks Jockey Y Fronts since I don't like anybody looking at my ticket while making the journey to and from the shower.
As I approached the young ladies, 2 thoughts crossed my mind pertaining to the minimum functional requirements of a pair of underpants and the failure of my current pair in meeting those requirements, towit:
I'm seriously considering designing my own range as a plan B and have made a few preliminary sketches. I think this one shows some promise:
All I need now is a name for my product range (preferably containing some witty railway related reference), so as ever, I'm asking my dear friends at CUK for assistance. Over to you....
Upon returning from the shower to my locker, for some reason my swipe card was somehow rendered ineffective in the operation of opening the locker containing my clothing. Somewhat panic stricken, I realised with horror that this would mean going to the desk to ask one of the 2 teenage girls on duty to give me an emergency card in order that I might liberate my apparel from said locker.
Now, I know what you're thinking, but it wasn't as bad as it could have been because I was attired in my trusty Marks and Sparks Jockey Y Fronts since I don't like anybody looking at my ticket while making the journey to and from the shower.
As I approached the young ladies, 2 thoughts crossed my mind pertaining to the minimum functional requirements of a pair of underpants and the failure of my current pair in meeting those requirements, towit:
- The provision of adequate support for the testicles
- The holding of position with body motion
- A close fit to prevent any unwanted side view violations
I'm seriously considering designing my own range as a plan B and have made a few preliminary sketches. I think this one shows some promise:
All I need now is a name for my product range (preferably containing some witty railway related reference), so as ever, I'm asking my dear friends at CUK for assistance. Over to you....
Comment