• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Who said AGW wasn't pushing science forwards?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Who said AGW wasn't pushing science forwards?

    Scientists eye curvaceous Earth gravity map ? The Register

    Gravity field mapping, ion drive propulsion... pretty pictures...



    The European Space Agency today unveiled a new gravity map of Earth put together using data from its Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) satellite.

    The "geoid" represents "the surface of an ideal global ocean in the absence of tides and currents, shaped only by gravity", ESA explains, adding: "It is a crucial reference for measuring ocean circulation, sea-level change and ice dynamics – all affected by climate change."
    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
    Originally posted by vetran
    Urine is quite nourishing

    #2
    I don't quite get what it is being shown there. Yellow and mountains indicating less gravity? I had expected a tendency for surface gravity to indicate less nearer the equator and greater at the poles, on average (as per the shape of the earth).

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
      I don't quite get what it is being shown there. Yellow and mountains indicating less gravity? I had expected a tendency for surface gravity to indicate less nearer the equator and greater at the poles, on average (as per the shape of the earth).
      Just because the earth is fatter at the equator it doesn't necessarily follow that it is more dense.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Churchill View Post
        Just because the earth is fatter at the equator it doesn't necessarily follow that it is more dense.
        true, the Earth is fatter at the equator because the net force squeezing the earth into a sphere is less there, because centrifual force is greater at the equator, though gravitational anomalies (because as you say density variations amongst other things) are bound to exist.

        Comment


          #5
          I was interested in the idea you can use gravitational monitoring to spot tectonic plate activity.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #6
            hang on a minute....there's something buried there

            near the ivory coast, some sort of obelisk




            (\__/)
            (>'.'<)
            ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

            Comment

            Working...
            X