• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

AGW certain or uncertain.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    AGW certain or uncertain.

    In the IPCC AR4 conclusions, they used words like "unequivocal" and "very likely".

    A new paper out seems to pour cold water on that:

    Here is Professor Judith's Curry review of the paper (a highly respected climate scientist):

    Separating natural and anthropogenically-forced decadal climate variability | Climate Etc.
    The conclusion of the paper:

    The main conclusion drawn from the body of work reviewed in this paper is that distinguishing between natural and externally forced variations is a difficult problem
    In other words "we don't know what's natural warming and what's AGW"


    And here is what Judith Curry says:

    The issues surrounding natural internal decadal scale variability are a huge challenge for separating out natural from forced climate change. The same issues and challenges raised for future projections remain also for the warming in the last few decades of the 20th century. Sorting this out is the key challenge. No more unequivocals or very likelys in the AR5, please.
    I'm alright Jack

    #2
    Sounds to me like the scientists need a lot more time and a LOT more funding.

    Nothing another dozen Carbon taxes can't fix.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
      Sounds to me like the scientists need a lot more time and a LOT more funding.
      Well I think it's money well spent.

      Who would have guessed, as we are told these scientists have established, that increased use of fossil fuels is actually unrelated to the increase in the world's population using them?

      And that carbon emissions from fossil fuels will carry on increasing despite fossil fuels running out?

      It takes a lot of funding to discover clever stuff like that.

      Comment


        #4
        Using just short words....

        Nothing in science is certain.

        The IPCC said that the warming of the climate system was unequivocal and it is highly likely that most of the rise is anthro... sorry, manmade.

        This paper does not change that as it is about the problem of distinguishing between manmade and natural vaiability at regional spatial scales and decadal timescales.

        I do not know how warm it will be in my village this time next week. But I can be reasonably certain that the UK will be warmer in average in June, than it was in March. Same thing.

        About the only thing that is certain is that any new research will be distorted into a mistaken soundbite by Blaster of Bates.
        Last edited by pjclarke; 12 April 2011, 20:40.
        My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
          Using just short words....
          ......... regional spatial scales and decaldal timescales.
          I don't normally bother posting on these sort of threads.

          But PJ given your statement about short words... what is decaldal?

          Sorry to be a numptie but I do like to try to understand..............
          Jim is a Jedi! - Dara
          Jim is EVIL! - Jenny Eclair

          Comment


            #6
            decaldal - definition: couldn't be arsed to spell check a post correcting a numptie.

            nitpicker: definition .... ?
            My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
              Using just short words....

              Nothing in science is certain.

              It's always interested me how the doommongers would eventually climb down. The pigs did it by changing the mantra, 'four legs good, two legs bad' into 'two legs good'

              It seems that the doomdsay merchants will do it by stating what has been blindingly obvious to the sceptics all along, and then adopt it as their very own position.
              Of course they will have to square this with previous statements , but they will do this with spin and playing with words, not with science.

              An AGW doomsday merchant will soon be as rare as a nazi in postwar Germany, so we should treasure pj, and not be too hard on him.



              decadal is a cycle that completes once every ten years, roughly



              (\__/)
              (>'.'<)
              ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by pjclarke View Post
                decaldal - definition: couldn't be arsed to spell check a post correcting a numptie.

                nitpicker: definition .... ?
                Thanks - Just as I thought.

                Your supercillious and patronising "Using just short words" statement was just that supercillious and patronising

                Yet you couldn't help yourself and just had to throw in a few "clever" words you had read somewhere cos you thought they sounded good. (I didn't point out "vaiability" by the way)

                You may be quite knowledgable about whatever it is you are constantly spouting on about - but to be honest you come across as a bit of a tool and incredibly boring.
                I'll go back to not commenting on posts that include your particular ego puffing content - and frankly if my "nitpicking" has punctured that particular balloon I consider it a triumph.
                Jim is a Jedi! - Dara
                Jim is EVIL! - Jenny Eclair

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
                  decadal is a cycle that completes once every ten years, roughly
                  Thanks EO - I did know what that word meant as it is an english word not one made up by a pompous knob

                  Pompous:
                  affected, bloated, boastful, bombastic, conceited, flatulent, flaunting, flowery, fustian, grandiloquent, grandiose, high and mighty, high-flown, highfaluting, imperious, important, inflated, magisterial, magniloquent, narcissistic, orotund, ostentatious, overbearing, overblown, pontifical, portentous, presumptuous, pretentious, puffed up, puffy, rhetorical, self-centered, self-important, selfish, showy, sonorous, stuck-up, supercilious, turgid, uppity, vain, vainglorious, windy

                  knob: An obnoxious person (see Urban Dictionary)
                  Jim is a Jedi! - Dara
                  Jim is EVIL! - Jenny Eclair

                  Comment


                    #10
                    If there is uncertainty over CAGW, why do they call us 'deniers' ?
                    (\__/)
                    (>'.'<)
                    ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X