• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Pravda's view on the Libyan situation

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Pravda's view on the Libyan situation

    Well the view of Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, a long-time Pravda columnist

    Libya: Where William Hague got it wrong


    William Hague. A conceited, self-opinionated and arrogant wannabe politician so typical of little men with little lives, whose only claim to fame is to have got it so monumentally wrong about Libya and to have sided with terrorists who fought against British troops for Al-Qaeda. Just who the Hell is this freak to say Gaddafi must go?

    William Hague, a failed politician fighting his corner in perhaps the most hated government in British history using Libya as an excuse to turn the attention away from the disastrous social policies of his party which ruined his country in the 1980s and early 1990s - reveals himself today as an abject failure as a Foreign Secretary, arguably the worst insult to British and world diplomacy in the annals of history.

    Like all little men, William Hague is a protagonist, eternally searching for a front to hide behind, an excuse for his sad little existence and a cover for the extreme unpopularity of his Tory party. And like all protagonists, William Hague has jumped the gun.

    Time after time after time, that whiny, tinny little voice on TV, that self-righteous tone of the British northerner-cum-toff (it never quite comes off, does it?), claiming that "Gaddafi" used weapons against innocent civilians, that NATO is there to defend civilians against a "dictator" and that "Gaddafi must go". Now just who the Hell is this...freak...to say anyone should go, in their own country? What kind of imperialist arrogance is that, coming from this apology for a man?

    If anyone should go, it is Hague, the traitor, whose sheer arrogance and unadulterated barefaced lies match the priggishness of their delivery and the pig-headed imperialist orgy they betray. And why? Because the Libya debacle was primed and prepared in (where else?) the USA decades back, failed once, in (where else?) Benghazi in the mid 1990s and now that the oil companies have finally got their foot in Libya, it's time to go for it before the oil companies could be nationalised.

    and on and on he rants ...
    crikey, he doesn't think much of Hague
    Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

    #2
    It could be because Hague might be able to shag his toyboy whilst the press will have all their attention onLibya
    Doing the needful since 1827

    Comment


      #3
      Feckin hell, what lunacy.

      Actually have a bit of time for Hague and deeply resented the Labour tactic to tackle him on his voice but I suppose he has looked a bit out of sorts over Libya. Still it is no reason to call him a shortarse, they could have just picked up his daft hat if they wanted to get to him.

      Comment


        #4
        Pravda's (means Truth in Russian) isn't exactly known for telling the truth, but this article is example of some classic cretinism as sasguru would no doubt say...

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by amcdonald View Post
          It could be because Hague might be able to shag his toyboy whilst the press will have all their attention onLibya
          Despite the press frenzy a time ago - he's not gay. FYI.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by realityhack View Post
            Despite the press frenzy a time ago - he's not gay. FYI.
            I don't care if he is or not. I do think he has matured from a young Tory twat into a pretty decent politician and I wish we had a few more mp's like him.

            Comment


              #7
              Hague is all right.

              He lost some prestige with that botched "diplomat" mission into Libya though.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by AtW View Post

                Hague is all right.

                He lost some prestige with that botched "diplomat" mission into Libya though.
                I'm starting to wonder if the Government hasn't botched the whole thing, in what seems like their frantic eagerness to be "doing something".
                Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                  I'm starting to wonder if the Government hasn't botched the whole thing, in what seems like their frantic eagerness to be "doing something".
                  Most certainly but he was hang out to dry ...

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
                    Well the view of Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey, a long-time Pravda columnist

                    Libya: Where William Hague got it wrong

                    crikey, he doesn't think much of Hague
                    Timmy-Banchy says more about himself in that little tantrum.
                    Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X