tony blair : the latest war criminal ?

[sappatz]

next after milosevic ? maybe he should get some "gourmet" food from haghe tribunal

[Fungus]

next after milosevic ? maybe he should get some "gourmet" food from haghe tribunal

As if anything could stick to Teflon Tony. I only wish the surface on non-stick pans lasted as long as him.

[Mordac]

next after milosevic ? maybe he should get some "gourmet" food from haghe tribunal

Don't be daft, only losers are branded war criminals (hence Hitler, Milosevic etc). If Germany had won WW2 then Churchill would probably have been hanged for Dresden, but the winners get to write history. It's always been this way.
The worst that will happen for Bliar is Britain will pull out its troops and call it a draw.

[sappatz]

blair

Don't be daft, only losers are branded war criminals (hence Hitler, Milosevic etc). If Germany had won WW2 then Churchill would probably have been hanged for Dresden, but the winners get to write history. It's always been this way.
The worst that will happen for Bliar is Britain will pull out its troops and call it a draw.

i know that. just wanted to make a point. law only applies to the loosers

[TinTin]

'War Criminals'

Funny how this description only seems to fit the 'other side'. Milosevic was branded a war criminal, yet Tony Blair defends his right to wage war with even God on his side. I'm sure Blair would have done exactly the same as Milosevic, had he been in his situation, ie overseeing the collapse of a formerly unified country which consisted of different nations (pretty much like the UK). The best bit of all was the quote from one of Milosevic's guards in the Hague (hardcore NATOist) who said that the highlight of his career would be one day to close the door of one of his cells behind Tony Blair or George Bush.

[Mailman]

Only an absolute ******* moron would compare Teflon Tony to Milo...oh thats right...thats what these anti-war goons are, ******* morons!

Mailman

[TinTin]

Pardon ?

Blairman, you won't find many anti-war contractors. I am personally pro-war but for the right reasons. None as far as Iraq was concerned. Same as we can't go to Zimbabwe and get rid of Mugabe, as much as it pains us. Different than say the Falklands where we had to.

[Mailman]

But fought for the right reasons....BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAA...only an absolute arse would say they are pro-war but then add a nice little politically correct line like that!

Yeah...you are closer to Teflon Tony than you think

Mailman

[Sergeant Apone]

"Take off & nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure"...

That's the kind of language I can relate to. You show promise - are you interested in joining the Colonial Marines?

[NoddY]

If you put the monkey on trial you also need to put the organ grinder on too.

According to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment#United_States

[impeachment] "...The procedure is in two steps. The House of Representatives must first pass "articles of impeachment" by a simple majority..."

Well the The House of Representatives has a Republican majority so that's that then.

However, I don't see any reason why these 'leaders' should not be put on trial for sending us into war on a whim. Highly unlikely of couse, because all legislatures involved gave the war a 'nod'. That's why I believe outcome to be a failure of Parliament to check the excesses of Blair and his pals.