Superinjunctions

[NickFitz]

My word, what a to-do on Twitter now somebody's posted all those names!

I assume it's contempt of court or some such if I link to the relevant account, or say what the slightly-inverted username is, or which hashtag it uses on its tweets

Still, none of them are people I expected to be any better than they ought to be

[AtW]

They've missed one - sasguru is DimPrawn's sockie...

[NickFitz]

For old-skool CUKers, the Usenet newsgroup uk.legal may be of interest (although there's at least one name missing from the list there).

[AtW]

Well, it's in the papers now:

Exposed on Twitter: Top-secret super-injunction names revealed on internet | Mail Online

[NickFitz]

Well, it's in the papers now:

Exposed on Twitter: Top-secret super-injunction names revealed on internet | Mail Online

As usual, the Mail gets it wrong: that isn't the account that posted the original tweets, which include all the names names which may or may not be associated with the actual injunctions and are neither blocked nor censored in any way

[cojak]

Some are hilarious and probably untrue, since I've only just read them (ta NF!) it's difficult to tell the true from the false.

[Pondlife]

Imogen from BB's liking for another welsh rarebit is the worst kept secret in football I am told.

[realityhack]

If it's contempt of court to state what is in the public domain, that is - the fact that searching for #superinjunction would possibly reveal information about a super injunction, and that said search on a public site leads you to many users, one of which is here: Twitter ...then let them try and sue me.

[realityhack]

Anyway - how do we know whether that user isn't just making up those names?

[AtW]

Anyway - how do we know whether that user isn't just making up those names?

We'll know the truth was told if they are dead by tomorrow morning!