• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

HMRC to search internet for tax evaders

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    HMRC to search internet for tax evaders

    My accountant sent me a link to this in the monthly newsletter they send out.

    Call me cynical but I think this is about as likely as those TV licence detector vans you have never seen.

    Though it will keep some plebs in their public sector non-jobs.

    News : NDS


    HMRC will use cutting-edge tools such as “web robot” software to search the internet and find targeted information about specified people and companies. Using the software, the department can pinpoint more accurately people who have failed to pay the right tax. The “web robot”, used with the department’s Connect computer system, also helps find people who are trading without telling HMRC.

    AtW's probable comment: Behaviour like this from the govermin is only likely to encourage more internet sockies.
    Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
    Feist - I Feel It All
    Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

    #2
    Its probably there to target ebay shops or people trading / selling without declaring tax. But remember kids this is the same computer system that can't calculate tax correctly yet.

    Comment


      #3
      Seems a bit inefficient, trying to determine sellers from often disguised user names, particularly on ebay, if they're resorting to web bots than asking eBay for a list of traders and their sales figures.

      An easier solution would be to compare bank accounts to tax declarations, as most internet selling requires going through a bank. This is something I thought they already did.

      Much harder to determine cash based transactions as, going from people I know that run mainly cash businesses, only a fool doesn't declare a realistic portion of the earnings. So the hard part is determining if a significant portion of the cash remains undeclared.

      I suppose this system will keep some IT bods in work, even if it turns out to be a turkey like many government IT projects.
      Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
      Feist - I Feel It All
      Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

      Comment


        #4
        A lot of people doing tutoring etc will use still local small ads and postcards rather than the net. Watch out for suspicious looking people taking notes while looking at shop noticeboards.

        PS Has anyone spotted the CCTVs they're hiding in toasters yet?

        turns out to be a turkey like many government IT projects
        It probably will, although just publicising these things must bring in some tax.
        Last edited by xoggoth; 4 July 2011, 11:56.
        bloggoth

        If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
        John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by PAH View Post
          An easier solution would be to compare bank accounts to tax declarations, as most internet selling requires going through a bank. This is something I thought they already did.
          Paypal have a credit card you can charge up with a positive balance straight from the account, perfect for people who have reasons to not deposit cash in a bank account.
          Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
            It probably will, although just publicising these things must bring in some tax.

            Yep. Much like IR35, they're hoping to scare people into volunteering more tax.

            To prove this tactic works I remember (in 2000 IIRC) a fellow contractor writing a 5 figure cheque to pay his IR35 dues without so much as getting his contract checked, so purely voluntary.

            We were on the same project so by the fact I have not been 'caught' for that work, and it being ~11 years ago I don't expect a knock on the door about it now (cut-off is 6 or 8 years for HMRC to start an investigation IIRC), all that cheque paid for was his peace of mind.

            I suppose it's like the lottery in reverse. Low odds on anything happening but when it does it might be a big one. At least with the lottery you know all the rules before you play the game. Not quite the same with IR35.
            Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
            Feist - I Feel It All
            Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

            Comment


              #7
              Scaremongering I suspect.

              Mind You - rather than going to all this bother to collect more Tax - would it not be easier and less costly just to raise Taxes for the masses ?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by gingerjedi View Post
                Paypal have a credit card you can charge up with a positive balance straight from the account, perfect for people who have reasons to not deposit cash in a bank account.

                I wonder if Paypal comes under jurisdiction for HMRC being able to request details of all customer records, so in effect is just an online banking system that HMRC can reconcile against their other sources of information.

                If not, maybe I can get my next contract paid into a Paypal account and declare myself offshore.
                Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
                Feist - I Feel It All
                Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by PAH View Post
                  I wonder if Paypal comes under jurisdiction for HMRC being able to request details of all customer records, so in effect is just an online banking system that HMRC can reconcile against their other sources of information.

                  If not, maybe I can get my next contract paid into a Paypal account and declare myself offshore.
                  "I don't trust PayPal with my money" is the answer to that one.
                  Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by AlfredJPruffock View Post
                    Rather than going to all this bother to collect more Tax - would it not be easier and less costly just to raise Taxes for the masses ?

                    They like to do both. Lots of little taxes instead of one big tax. Makes people think they're getting taxed less when they forget to factor in income tax, VAT (and VAT on fuel duty for petrol/diesel), savings interest tax, etc, on each pound they earn and either spend or save.
                    Feist - 1234. One camera, one take, no editing. Superb. How they did it
                    Feist - I Feel It All
                    Feist - The Bad In Each Other (Later With Jools Holland)

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X