• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

keep 75% with ltd co, 80% with umbrella?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    keep 75% with ltd co, 80% with umbrella?

    Many umbrella companies advertise that you can keep 80% of your rate.

    Through my ltd co I've been able to keep 75% of my rate in the form of salary, training, dividends and pension contributions.

    Am I being a mug or do the umbrella companies who quote 80% only talk about salary + dividends to come up with 80%?

    #2
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    Many umbrella companies advertise that you can keep 80% of your rate.

    Through my ltd co I've been able to keep 75% of my rate in the form of salary, training, dividends and pension contributions.

    Am I being a mug or do the umbrella companies who quote 80% only talk about salary + dividends to come up with 80%?
    Umbrella companies can't pay dividends under the Managed Service Company legislation. These kind of figures are usually dependent on claiming high expenses (which obviously would have to be incurred and be allowable) or are being offered by something other than a PAYE umbrella
    HTH
    Connect with me on LinkedIn

    Follow us on Twitter.

    ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

    Comment


      #3
      Anything which claims 80 to 85% retention will carry more risk. Is it really worth it if you're already achieving 75%?

      And, by the way, the 80/85 figure doesn't tell the whole story either. Promoters of these arrangement typically charge 10%.

      So HMRC only gets 5-10%. Do you think they'd be happy with that?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
        Anything which claims 80 to 85% retention will carry more risk. Is it really worth it if you're already achieving 75%?
        Well quite. My 75% is the figure after all the overhead costs - accountants, insurances and other expenses taken into account.

        I don't know why people go with umbrellas. I find that ltd co is quite simple if you've a good accountant who will accept your invoices and bills on a monthly basis.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
          Many umbrella companies advertise that you can keep 80% of your rate.

          Through my ltd co I've been able to keep 75% of my rate in the form of salary, training, dividends and pension contributions.

          Am I being a mug or do the umbrella companies who quote 80% only talk about salary + dividends to come up with 80%?
          It's pretty well generally agreed that Ltd Co. with Salary + Dividend is the most efficient way of operating without running the risk of getting caught up in somehting like the BN66 problems. Anyone who is claiming better than 75% as a commercial offering will be relying on one of a number of "loopholes" to achieve it. This varies between loaded expenses claims (that may or may not be legitimate) to complicated offshore arrangements.

          If you are happy to run the risk of a tax investigation or worse for the sake of an extra 5% then go for it. Otherwise carry on as you are and avoid the potential stress.

          As other have said elsewhere, you can do much better than 75% with a Ltd. if you put more into a pension/SIPP, although this only really works for those who don't need to maximise their personal income to pay the bills etc.

          EDIT: Ironically the ad running in the side bar when I typed this reply was for an Umbrella company offering an 80% return....
          Last edited by DaveB; 5 September 2011, 12:54.
          "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

          Comment


            #6
            80%

            Just checked out that link on the right - they pay a salary and then the rest as a forex loan - on a 525 contract, i would take home 9,700 per month (with 1200 expenses a month) after tax / fees etc - damn that is tempting!!!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by SneakySimon View Post
              Just checked out that link on the right - they pay a salary and then the rest as a forex loan - on a 525 contract, i would take home 9,700 per month (with 1200 expenses a month) after tax / fees etc - damn that is tempting!!!
              I had an email from Accounting Web this morning (it's free to sign up to read their website) it said

              HMRC cracks down on disguised remuneration
              Paying employees through loans and trusts to avoid tax will be forbidden in most cases, according to new guidance on disguised remuneration provisions published by HMRC. Nick Huber reports.
              There is more about it on this thread - http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...-question.html

              Or you can register and read it yourself here - Login to AccountingWEB | AccountingWEB
              "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by SneakySimon View Post
                Just checked out that link on the right - they pay a salary and then the rest as a forex loan - on a 525 contract, i would take home 9,700 per month (with 1200 expenses a month) after tax / fees etc - damn that is tempting!!!
                I think that is what Tract were doing as well.

                http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...anagement.html

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by SneakySimon View Post
                  Just checked out that link on the right - they pay a salary and then the rest as a forex loan - on a 525 contract, i would take home 9,700 per month (with 1200 expenses a month) after tax / fees etc - damn that is tempting!!!
                  But are you willing to take the risk for an extra £485 a month? (which is what the extra 5% works out to.)
                  "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    485??

                    But it would not be 485 per month – it would be much more – below are rough figures (don’t worry, I use an accountant so excuse me if below are wrong!)

                    In
                    11,550 Monthly Monies

                    Out
                    Expenses = 1,200 pm
                    Salary = 825 pm
                    TX & NI = 300 pm (estimate!)
                    Corp Tax = 1,845

                    Remaining = 7,380

                    Based on the above, after corporation tax, I would be able to take home the following:

                    825 salary
                    1200 expenses
                    7380 dividends (£5000 of which will be taxed at 20% - so reduces by £1000

                    Take Home = 6,560

                    Compared to 9,700 take home via ‘Choice Premier’ with only £350 per month being paid in tax.

                    I am staying Ltd, I like to sleep at night but you can see why the Umbrellas / EBT are so popular? (and I can dream of the holidays / ferrari’s!)

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X