• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Clear case of negligence

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Clear case of negligence


    "A large portion of his body flew about 100 feet onto the southbound platform, where it struck Gayane Zokhrabov, then 58. She was knocked to the ground, her leg and wrist broken and her shoulder injured."


    #2
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post

    "A large portion of his body flew about 100 feet onto the southbound platform, where it struck Gayane Zokhrabov, then 58. She was knocked to the ground, her leg and wrist broken and her shoulder injured."

    The key to this is negligence. Indeed the deceased was negligent.
    "A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Paddy View Post
      The key to this is negligence. Indeed the deceased was negligent.
      if it was found that it was the deceased fault that he was hit by a train then I agree he (or his insurance company) should be sued.
      Coffee's for closers

      Comment


        #4
        So does this mean we can sue the estates/families of train suicides for lost billing time due to delays caused.

        Comment

        Working...
        X