• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Finally some real good news!

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Finally some real good news!

    High-speed rail line is given the green light



    Justine Greening, the Transport Secretary, will disclose that the Coalition has rejected calls to abandon or alter its plans for the project, which will see trains travelling at 250mph through the Chilterns.

    The decision will be welcomed by business leaders but will dismay critics — including some senior Conservatives — who fear the new line will spoil some of the most beautiful parts of rural England.

    Construction of the 100 mile-long line to Birmingham will begin in 2016 and take a decade to complete at a cost of £17 billion. Extensions to Manchester and Yorkshire could then follow, costing at least another £15 billion.

    The Government’s final decision was reached after an internal assessment concluded that the other main options would not meet future demand for rail travel.

    The study, by Network Rail, concluded that the proposed High Speed 2 line is “the most effective intervention” to address overcrowding problems on transport.

    Opponents — including councils along the proposed HS2 route — have suggested upgrading existing rail lines instead.

    The Network Rail study concluded that the other suggested options would “deliver considerably fewer benefits” than a high-speed line.

    Ministers say HS2 will make the journey time between London and Birmingham less than 50 minutes.

    Source: High-speed rail line is given the green light - Telegraph

    Now it's just a matter of time before bored trophy wifes of Brum's top enterpreneurs can go shopping to London during the day and be back in time to cook nice dinner for their hard working husbands

    #2
    Who's paying for it?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
      Who's paying for it?
      Taxpayers.

      Comment


        #4
        What's the point when they cant even run/maintain/upgrade the existing standard network properly ??

        Also, why to brummy? Who would want a high speed link to there?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by wim121 View Post
          Also, why to brummy? Who would want a high speed link to there?
          To? I think you'll find it so people can get out of brum quickly..........

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Mr.Whippy View Post
            To? I think you'll find it so people can get out of brum quickly..........
            Hahahahahaha good point ......

            I would have just thought, since they have done a lot of west coast line work in the past decade, that instead, they would have put the high speed link along the east coast as it's a very popular commuter route as well.

            Also if people working in london, could get better commute times to the NE, more would live there, rejuvenating scummy parts of the UK ...

            Comment


              #7
              Check out the premium Kent users have to pay to use HS1 over existing routes... but it is a bloody good service
              How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

              Comment


                #8
                Not as bad as the price between st albans and london apparently ... The most expensive in the country ...

                Comment


                  #9
                  ...and no one questions if £17 billion to build a 100 mile railway is value for money - in my drunken state I think that works out at 170 million per mile!
                  How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                  Comment


                    #10
                    or £113000 per metre
                    How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X