Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Possibly better than the snail in the ginger beer bottle.
"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...
Are you sure you are cut out for this posting on an internet forum lark?
WHS.
"I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
- Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...
Possibly better than the snail in the ginger beer bottle.
But a High Court judge ruled that getaway drivers do not have a ‘duty of care’ to their accomplices.
Counself fot the Platintiff: "But your Honour, according to paragraph 4 of subsection 10 of the criminal code of practice, the getaway driver should have a 'duty of care' to their accomplices."
Judge: "In this case the accomplice had opted out. Objection overruled".
Behold the warranty -- the bold print giveth and the fine print taketh away.
Comment