• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Syria and the lack of action

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Syria and the lack of action

    So Ban Ki-moon Kofi Annan,Obama, Cameron etc are making a real difference by condemning the violence in Syria. I expect unless we see a video of Assad executing some Syrian children and his wife sporting a handbag made from the skin of innocent women, it will be more lip-service. Should there be some intervention?

    #2
    Originally posted by russell View Post
    Should there be some intervention?
    Yes, but Putin is doing his best to protect his spiritual friend.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      Yes, but Putin is doing his best to protect his spiritual friend.
      That is an excuse, they disregarded the UN before, when they went to Iraq. It's because Obama is looking for a second term, shameful.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by russell View Post
        That is an excuse, they disregarded the UN before, when they went to Iraq.
        There were some technical reasons that allowed them to do it, but the results were very bad and Obama made a lot of political capital on it.

        Libya was a good example however that it can be done but this time Russia won't accept it, just shows how low the role of the country now is under Putin - come to think of it he did the same thing in Chechnya in 1999 and the West was silent: he certainly can see clear parallels so he is doing his best to protect his scumbag friends.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by AtW View Post
          There were some technical reasons that allowed them to do it, but the results were very bad and Obama made a lot of political capital on it.

          Libya was a good example however that it can be done but this time Russia won't accept it, just shows how low the role of the country now is under Putin - come to think of it he did the same thing in Chechnya in 1999 and the West was silent: he certainly can see clear parallels so he is doing his best to protect his scumbag friends.
          I take it you won't be going back to Russia in the next few years.
          merely at clientco for the entertainment

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by eek View Post
            I take it you won't be going back to Russia in the next few years.
            Other than in a couple of diplomatic bags...

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by AtW View Post
              There were some technical reasons that allowed them to do it, but the results were very bad and Obama made a lot of political capital on it.

              Libya was a good example however that it can be done but this time Russia won't accept it, just shows how low the role of the country now is under Putin - come to think of it he did the same thing in Chechnya in 1999 and the West was silent: he certainly can see clear parallels so he is doing his best to protect his scumbag friends.
              Be very careful of people who try to poke you with an umbrella!
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by zeitghost
                Which part of "there's no oil in Syria" do you find difficult to understand?
                There is oil in Syria. Not an awful lot, but there is oil; quite a lot of gas too.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  There is oil in Syria. Not an awful lot, but there is oil; quite a lot of gas too.
                  The Wiki says that they are expected to be a net importer of oil in 2012. High unemployment, high birth rate, once relied on oil exports ... everything sounds fine.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
                    The Wiki says that they are expected to be a net importer of oil in 2012. High unemployment, high birth rate, once relied on oil exports ... everything sounds fine.
                    That’s a sign of the abject stupidity of Assad. They’ve got oil and gas and lots of sunshine; they could easily be self-sufficient in energy AND export oil, gas and electricity, but the place is run by a loony.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X