Hi all,
I find myself in, perhaps, an unusual position and as a newbie I'd appreciate some opinions.
I am contracted through an agency to another firm who are the sole supplier of temporary staff to a very well known company.
To be clear, we have
Well known company : a few permies
Sole supplier : a fair number of permies and the rest contactors
My agency
Me ( or more specifically, my company )
Now my agent is an untrustworthy fellow. I'm ashamed to admit that he rather took advantage to my newbie-ness to lie to me about opting out
and also managed to stiff me on the rate post-interview. More fool me. Lesson learned.
This setup also means that I'm subject to double 'agency' fees. Contractors who are directly contracted to the sole supplier are probably on a fair bit more than me given my
agent is a bit of a shyster and is probably taking a hefty margin.
However, things are not all doom and gloom.
Firstly, I signed the opt-out after the introduction but before I started work, so I believe that it's invalid.
Secondly, the sole supplier is going to be replaced with a different sole supplier at just the time that my contract comes up for renewal. I've read my contract carefully and it restricts me
from working directly for the client for 12 months ( or 8 weeks if the opt-out is invalid ). But in this case the client is named as the sole supplier. The name of the well known company is never mentioned in my contract.
I'm thinking that maybe I could contract directly for the new sole supplier and cut out my agent when my current contact ends. Does that sound feasible? Or would it be more realistic
to simply try to reduce my agents margin at contract renewal?
cheers.
I find myself in, perhaps, an unusual position and as a newbie I'd appreciate some opinions.
I am contracted through an agency to another firm who are the sole supplier of temporary staff to a very well known company.
To be clear, we have
Well known company : a few permies
Sole supplier : a fair number of permies and the rest contactors
My agency
Me ( or more specifically, my company )
Now my agent is an untrustworthy fellow. I'm ashamed to admit that he rather took advantage to my newbie-ness to lie to me about opting out
and also managed to stiff me on the rate post-interview. More fool me. Lesson learned.
This setup also means that I'm subject to double 'agency' fees. Contractors who are directly contracted to the sole supplier are probably on a fair bit more than me given my
agent is a bit of a shyster and is probably taking a hefty margin.
However, things are not all doom and gloom.
Firstly, I signed the opt-out after the introduction but before I started work, so I believe that it's invalid.
Secondly, the sole supplier is going to be replaced with a different sole supplier at just the time that my contract comes up for renewal. I've read my contract carefully and it restricts me
from working directly for the client for 12 months ( or 8 weeks if the opt-out is invalid ). But in this case the client is named as the sole supplier. The name of the well known company is never mentioned in my contract.
I'm thinking that maybe I could contract directly for the new sole supplier and cut out my agent when my current contact ends. Does that sound feasible? Or would it be more realistic
to simply try to reduce my agents margin at contract renewal?
cheers.
Comment