- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No really, it was all bulltulip?
Collapse
X
-
-
Oh that - Thought you were talking about that stupid Mayan calendar thing
Although come to think of it, today isn't over yetWork in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ here -
The cagw scare mongering would be an idle intellectual curiosity, if it was not for the fact that we are now paying sky high prices for dirt-cheap energy
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
-
Ah, the Washingon Times - founded, and funded, by theMooniesUnification Church.
Next week: DP cites L. Ron Hubbard in a debate about the true meaning of ChristmasComment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostAh, the Washingon Times - founded, and funded, by theMooniesUnification Church.
Next week: DP cites L. Ron Hubbard in a debate about the true meaning of Christmas
luckily Forbes has a similar story
in fact, many main stream news organisations are picking up on the fact that 16 years of no warming just might be a problem for the warming theory
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
-
Here is the scientific argument from Professor Judith Curry that climate models are bunk.
Climate sensitivity in the AR5 SOD | Climate Etc.
She is writing a paper about why the models are wrong, and it is her expertise, atmospheric science, so lets wait and see.Last edited by BlasterBates; 22 December 2012, 11:54.I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by zeitghostI see that the current Xmas Bah! Humbug! issue of New Scientist is still going on about AGW in tedious detail.
It's a religion, not science.Comment
-
Originally posted by zeitghostI see that the current Xmas Bah! Humbug! issue of New Scientist is still going on about AGW in tedious detail.
It's a religion, not science.
The IPCC said that the planet would warm by x
When the planet didnt warm by x, they said it would have, but aerosols kept it cool
Now they are saying aerosols have not kept the planet cool
but they seem to have forgotten their original prediction, and have not explained the discrepency
(\__/)
(>'.'<)
("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to WorkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment