Basic facts:
a) Contractor X having >100K in Ltd Co account, earning 'nothing'. This could be transferred to Pension. This will result in corp tax savings as well
b) X also has a re-payment BTL for 72K for the next 14 years. Pays £500 monthly towards this loan from personal a/c.
The question:
is whether to contribute to pension OR pay off the BTL, which is beneficial for wealth transfer to the next generation at a) in 14 years and b) also when X dies. Calculation follows:
1. Paying off BTL:
To pay off BTL, X has to withdraw 72K from the company as dividend. This 72K will suffer 25% tax. Therefore the total money taken from the company a/c will be 96K. Once BTL is paid off, X can save £500 monthly (say in an ISA) that is otherwise paid to BTL.
Taking the interest received is 4% for next 14 years. In 14 years, X will receive 85K+29K = 114K in cash. This is in addition to the property. The cash in hand can be spend without incurring a death tax. No fees need be paid to pension mgnt companies.
When X dies, no IHT applies as the property is below IHT threshold (even if IHT applies this will be same in case (2) below and therefore can be taken out of the equation I guess).
While this option looks reasonable, the tax payments now (24K additional tax on dividend and 20K potential corp tax saving= 44K), looks a bit on the high considering the flexibility available to the Ltd co.
1.b. An interest only BTL is not foreseen as the property is not expected to sky rocket in the next 14 years. Therefore the idea of saving tax by deducting 'interest expense' is not considered important.
2. Paying to Pension:
As the money taken out from the company is 96K in case (1), this amount is taken as the reference amt transferred to pension. This option will enjoy a corp tax saving of 21% (albeit on future earnings). Therefore the total money saved due to pension is 116K. Say the pension returns 4% interest for next 14 years. In 14 years, X will have 116K+87K = 203K in pension cash. Say a total of 15% fee is paid to pension mgnt companies. The pot will still have 173K. This is about 60K more than (1) and therefore impressive. This is in addition to the property which would have paid by itself.
However, when X dies, 55% tax on pension pot kicks in and the wealth transferred will be 173K-95K = 78K. This is 36K less than (1). Not so impressive. Drawing down the pension in order to avoid the 55% death tax will not work as X does not have any other pension, cannot meet the 20K minimum pension and therefore the whole of the money will have to be left over in the pension.
3. There is a third option to sell the BTL property and take the money and put it in long term savings. This will give X cash in 14 years but no property. Due to the initial high cash input, advantage from tax free savings will not be as much as in (1). There fore the total wealth will be less than (1) as the rental income will be higher than interest rates.
4. The fourth option is to close the company and take the money, put it in long term savings/ pay off BTL. This will incur 10% tax plus fees which might be another 5%. The difference is only 10% (i.e. 9.6K now and 17K in 14 years) for all that hassle, in comparison with (1). Therefore not sure that is worth the while.
Most people say investing in pension is the best. But for the given scenario it appears solution (1) i.e. paying off BTL is economically superior. What are we missing?
Are there any better solutions out there? say Trusts etc (X is not interested in gimmicks like 'loan backs' etc though)
a) Contractor X having >100K in Ltd Co account, earning 'nothing'. This could be transferred to Pension. This will result in corp tax savings as well
b) X also has a re-payment BTL for 72K for the next 14 years. Pays £500 monthly towards this loan from personal a/c.
The question:
is whether to contribute to pension OR pay off the BTL, which is beneficial for wealth transfer to the next generation at a) in 14 years and b) also when X dies. Calculation follows:
1. Paying off BTL:
To pay off BTL, X has to withdraw 72K from the company as dividend. This 72K will suffer 25% tax. Therefore the total money taken from the company a/c will be 96K. Once BTL is paid off, X can save £500 monthly (say in an ISA) that is otherwise paid to BTL.
Taking the interest received is 4% for next 14 years. In 14 years, X will receive 85K+29K = 114K in cash. This is in addition to the property. The cash in hand can be spend without incurring a death tax. No fees need be paid to pension mgnt companies.
When X dies, no IHT applies as the property is below IHT threshold (even if IHT applies this will be same in case (2) below and therefore can be taken out of the equation I guess).
While this option looks reasonable, the tax payments now (24K additional tax on dividend and 20K potential corp tax saving= 44K), looks a bit on the high considering the flexibility available to the Ltd co.
1.b. An interest only BTL is not foreseen as the property is not expected to sky rocket in the next 14 years. Therefore the idea of saving tax by deducting 'interest expense' is not considered important.
2. Paying to Pension:
As the money taken out from the company is 96K in case (1), this amount is taken as the reference amt transferred to pension. This option will enjoy a corp tax saving of 21% (albeit on future earnings). Therefore the total money saved due to pension is 116K. Say the pension returns 4% interest for next 14 years. In 14 years, X will have 116K+87K = 203K in pension cash. Say a total of 15% fee is paid to pension mgnt companies. The pot will still have 173K. This is about 60K more than (1) and therefore impressive. This is in addition to the property which would have paid by itself.
However, when X dies, 55% tax on pension pot kicks in and the wealth transferred will be 173K-95K = 78K. This is 36K less than (1). Not so impressive. Drawing down the pension in order to avoid the 55% death tax will not work as X does not have any other pension, cannot meet the 20K minimum pension and therefore the whole of the money will have to be left over in the pension.
3. There is a third option to sell the BTL property and take the money and put it in long term savings. This will give X cash in 14 years but no property. Due to the initial high cash input, advantage from tax free savings will not be as much as in (1). There fore the total wealth will be less than (1) as the rental income will be higher than interest rates.
4. The fourth option is to close the company and take the money, put it in long term savings/ pay off BTL. This will incur 10% tax plus fees which might be another 5%. The difference is only 10% (i.e. 9.6K now and 17K in 14 years) for all that hassle, in comparison with (1). Therefore not sure that is worth the while.
Most people say investing in pension is the best. But for the given scenario it appears solution (1) i.e. paying off BTL is economically superior. What are we missing?
Are there any better solutions out there? say Trusts etc (X is not interested in gimmicks like 'loan backs' etc though)
Comment