I have been on the same site for nearly 2 years but the contracts i have had have varied between 1 and 3 months with 'breaks' in between one of which was 5 weeks, my agency told me not to worry as each contract has had different managers and assignments and I have not had continuous employment, is he right?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Another 2 year rule question
Collapse
X
-
Another 2 year rule question
Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave Johnson -
Erm, no. Same location, and same client so it has predominately been your place of work. If you were off-site for roughly 40% of the time, you can ignore it but not otherwise. Details are buried somewhere on the HMRC website if you want to dig it out.
And what's "employment" then...?Blog? What blog...? -
What if i get another contract for a month or so and go back?
If the worst comes to the worst can i just continue with my umbrella sans expensess? I know this may seem an alien concept to some of the regs on here but i do realy like it here and the pay compares favourably (guv work) to what i would get elsewhere which more than makes up for the loss of expensess.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
All it means is that you can't claim travel and accomodation costs for working there after two years because it has become your "normal place of work".You don't have to leave if you don't want to. Potenitally putting yourself out of work seems a damn sily way to save expense claims
And are you another one of those who pay umbrellas to look after your business and then don't ask them to explain the rules they're working to?Blog? What blog...?Comment
-
Originally posted by gingerjediWhat if i get another contract for a month or so and go back?Comment
-
So Gordon Brown can treat me as an employee when it suits him for the purpose of tax but with none of the rights a 'proper' employee would have.Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
My case is particularly ironic as i am working for a gov department that is being outsourced in the near future and therefore by there own rules they are not allowed to fill posts with employees so they are backfilling with contractors!Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
60% Rule
Originally posted by XLMonkeynope, that won't do. HMRC guidance is that any break needs to be for a period of at least 6 months in order to re-set the 2 year rule clock. However, if you go to the HMRC website and search for 2-year rule, then it will give you all the details, plus examples.
Of course you could always change employer ....Comment
-
So when the department is outsourced to a private company assuming they want me would that count? would i need to move agency?Science isn't about why, it's about why not. You ask: why is so much of our science dangerous? I say: why not marry safe science if you love it so much. In fact, why not invent a special safety door that won't hit you in the butt on the way out, because you are fired. - Cave JohnsonComment
-
Originally posted by gingerjediand therefore by there own rulesWe must strike at the lies that have spread like disease through our mindsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment