Porn in the Economist

Mich the Tester

Obstinate Git

Mich the Tester is NOT a disguised employee

Join Date:

Sep 2008

Location:

Euroland

Posts:

27898

Thanks (Given):

50

Thanks (Received):

161

Likes (Given):

318

Likes (Received):

551
#1

Porn in the Economist

26 July 2013, 07:18

Look, out there's a picture of a ****;

The Economist explains: How will Britain's porn filters work? | The Economist

And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Tags: None

Reply With Quote
darmstadt

I live on CUK

darmstadt is always on top

Join Date:

Jul 2005

Location:

The Eurozone

Posts:

20014

Thanks (Given):

54

Thanks (Received):

1,500

Likes (Given):

298

Likes (Received):

4,112
#2

26 July 2013, 07:36

Government porn:

“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”
Reply With Quote
Comment
doodab

Contractor 'til I die

doodab 's job has never been outsourced

Join Date:

Jan 2010

Location:

A bit too close to Wandsworth

Posts:

16178

Thanks (Given):

10

Thanks (Received):

117

Likes (Given):

340

Likes (Received):

516
#3

26 July 2013, 07:49

Dear CMD,

Porn is there because people want it. Go and have a wank to clear your head.

Yours etc,

Doodab

While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'
Reply With Quote
Comment
Mich the Tester

Obstinate Git

Mich the Tester is NOT a disguised employee

Join Date:

Sep 2008

Location:

Euroland

Posts:

27898

Thanks (Given):

50

Thanks (Received):

161

Likes (Given):

318

Likes (Received):

551
#4

26 July 2013, 07:50

Originally posted by doodab View Post

Dear CMD,

Porn is there because people want it. Go and have a wank to clear your head.

Yours etc,

Doodab

whs

And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Reply With Quote
Comment
TheFaQQer

Faqqed Off

TheFaQQer is a fount of knowledge

Join Date:

Oct 2006

Posts:

36581

Thanks (Given):

392

Thanks (Received):

1,392

Likes (Given):

3,828

Likes (Received):

3,430
#5

26 July 2013, 08:28

clbuttic

Best Forum Advisor 2014
Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership
Reply With Quote
Comment
Paddy

Double Godlike!

Paddy is a fount of knowledge

Join Date:

Jul 2006

Posts:

12932

Thanks (Given):

823

Thanks (Received):

619

Likes (Given):

4,533

Likes (Received):

2,348
#6

26 July 2013, 09:21

Such nuances mean that the most effective way to run a censorship scheme is to employ real people to categorise sites or images by hand

"A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George Orwell
Reply With Quote
Comment
Mich the Tester

Obstinate Git

Mich the Tester is NOT a disguised employee

Join Date:

Sep 2008

Location:

Euroland

Posts:

27898

Thanks (Given):

50

Thanks (Received):

161

Likes (Given):

318

Likes (Received):

551
#7

26 July 2013, 09:21

Originally posted by Paddy View Post

good find

And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Reply With Quote
Comment