Border security system 'at risk of collapse', warns official watchdog - Telegraph
The National Audit Office (NAO) said the Home Office’s Warnings Index, or “WI”, was introduced nearly 20 years ago but was only designed to have a seven year life-span.
Every passenger arriving in Britain has their passport swiped through the WI system which is meant to detect whether they are known to be dangerous, or whether they are “wanted” criminals who should be detained for questioning. It also raises the alarm if they have previously been refused entry to Britain.
“Frontline staff use a database called the Warnings Index to check all passengers’ passports and to ascertain whether the passengers should be detained or questioned by other agencies.
“The Warnings Index went live in the early 1990s and was designed to have a seven-year life span.
“It is now unstable and at risk of collapsing. It also contains a great deal of out-of‑date information, which can delay passenger processing if officers need to leave passport control to double-check entries.
“It will, for example, contain details of somebody being refused entry to the UK but not state whether they have subsequently been granted permission to enter.”
Okay, who worked on this crock?
The National Audit Office (NAO) said the Home Office’s Warnings Index, or “WI”, was introduced nearly 20 years ago but was only designed to have a seven year life-span.
Every passenger arriving in Britain has their passport swiped through the WI system which is meant to detect whether they are known to be dangerous, or whether they are “wanted” criminals who should be detained for questioning. It also raises the alarm if they have previously been refused entry to Britain.
“Frontline staff use a database called the Warnings Index to check all passengers’ passports and to ascertain whether the passengers should be detained or questioned by other agencies.
“The Warnings Index went live in the early 1990s and was designed to have a seven-year life span.
“It is now unstable and at risk of collapsing. It also contains a great deal of out-of‑date information, which can delay passenger processing if officers need to leave passport control to double-check entries.
“It will, for example, contain details of somebody being refused entry to the UK but not state whether they have subsequently been granted permission to enter.”
Okay, who worked on this crock?
Comment