This is a transcript of a court Judgement; I can only imagine what the Judge had to read in advance of this case…
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Who Said Law was boring?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
given the nature of their relationship whereby she was no more than one of the many bunnies in his club (or as Mr Baxendale-Waker himself might succinctly put it, one of the "tulip girls")
Charming!Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Comment
-
The provision is always conditional on my satisfaction with the relationship. As soon as I am no longer satisfied, the use benefits are withdrawn."'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
So.... being a bit of a simple straight talking northern bloke.... Who got the flat and range rover?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostSo.... being a bit of a simple straight talking northern bloke.... Who got the flat and range rover?merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostSo.... being a bit of a simple straight talking northern bloke.... Who got the flat and range rover?Growing old is mandatory
Growing up is optionalComment
-
-
Originally posted by Halo Jones View PostHis name was 1st on the document which means he was asking for summary judgement on who owned the 2 items, the Judge dismisses the application in item 50 which means he loses & she gets themComment
-
Originally posted by NickFitz View PostNo, it means the case goes on to be heard in full, unless he does the sensible thing and cuts his losses. Given that the judge strongly implies that he's submitted dodgy, post-dated documents in support of his claim, he might well not want to have his claim examined in full any more
“Summary Judgement” Noted for future researchGrowing old is mandatory
Growing up is optionalComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment