PDA

View Full Version : Chico was right. God is matematically proven



Francko
11th August 2006, 10:35
Apologies that it is in italian but it's quite easy to understand.

http://www.bollatiboringhieri.it/copertine/8833916790.jpg

Anyone with a better mathematical background (ATW??? :rollin: :rollin: ) can prove the opposite.

AtW
11th August 2006, 10:40
Even if Chico's God really existed then I would have rejected such cruel God, thankfully it is plainly obvious to any rational person that given contradictory religions and complete foolishness of their assertions as well as complete lack of evidence to support their claims that all such Gods do not exist.

It is possible however that there are higher beings that are capable of supernatural things attributed to God, ie walking over water, however this is just matter of technology. I accept however that for fools like Chico such supreme beings are the same as God.

Francko
11th August 2006, 10:42
It is possible however that there are higher beings that are capable of supernatural things attributed to God, ie walking over water, however this is just matter of technology. I accept however that for fools like Chico such supreme beings are the same as God.

Which bit of the mathematical notation isn't so clear? :D

hyperD
11th August 2006, 10:47
ie walking over water, however this is just matter of technology.

LOL! I can just see it - Microsoft's Walking On Water 2006 Galilee Edition. Make sure you don't get a Blue Sea of Death...

threaded
11th August 2006, 18:11
Unfortunately at least one of the axioms is bollox, so the proof is proof of what?

Jabberwocky
11th August 2006, 18:36
How can an axiom be bollux dipshit ? An axiom is a sentence or proposition that is taken for granted as true. God, you are a complete fool.

AtW
11th August 2006, 19:04
How can an axiom be bollux dipshit ?

You should try learn how to argue your view without resorting to name calling, but then again its probably best for you not to because it makes it easier to sport a retard.

threaded
11th August 2006, 19:10
AtW: So do we have an axiom that Jabberwocky is a retard, it is after all, self evident?

AtW
11th August 2006, 19:16
AtW: So do we have an axiom that Jabberwocky is a retard, it is after all, self evident?

I think so, at least this thing is for certain.

Fungus
11th August 2006, 20:01
AtW: So do we have an axiom that Jabberwocky is a retard, it is after all, self evident?

Do we need to state the bleedin' obvious?

Jabberwocky
11th August 2006, 20:43
Do we need to state the bleedin' obvious?

Are you one of those cockney chaps ? All cock and no balls ?

Francko
11th August 2006, 23:19
You should try learn how to argue your view without resorting to name calling, but then again its probably best for you not to because it makes it easier to sport a retard.

Shouldn't you give the good example when trying to teach?

AtW
12th August 2006, 00:04
Shouldn't you give the good example when trying to teach?

But I do - "retard" is a medical term, not name calling http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif

threaded
12th August 2006, 00:06
Shouldn't you give the good example when trying to teach?
Here is a good counter example to one of the axioms: basically one of the axioms state that the opposite of a good thing is a bad thing. So if you can find a good thing and it's opposite is also a good thing then the axiom is flawed.

A good thing: Mountains are high. It's opposite: Valleys are low.

But you can also say:

A good thing: Valleys are low. It's opposite: Mountains are high.

QED

HTH
:)

AtW
12th August 2006, 00:08
Good and Bad are relative things, say Chico's favourite humanist Hitler had different view on those things than most people.

xoggoth
12th August 2006, 08:38
Who says that if god is real he must be benign? Maybe he's a right bastard like most gods apart from the Christian one. Or maybe there are lots of gods like the Romans/Greeks believed. Much more in keeping with the CUK free market philosophy, the single all powerful god sounds like socialism to me.

AtW
12th August 2006, 09:25
Romans/Greeks believed.

I much prefer those Gods - for starters when you make sacrifice to them you just give them bones and keep the meet, thanks to Prometeus. Plus these Gods are much more like human - Zeus shags eathly women and this allows him to be kept in touch. IMO all Gods that came after these are much more opressive and pocessive.

threaded
12th August 2006, 10:04
In the Greek mindset Zeus and co. came after the other gods, such as Gaea etc. Zeus himself was the son of Cronus who was the son of Uranus who was the son of Gaea, and also her husband... Also there is much more of the "scratch my back I'll scratch yours" mentality. i.e. if you give a sacrifice to a god, then you expect something in return and as each god had multiple uses you'd give a sacrifice to the usefulness required. So if you wanted rain you'd sacrifice to the rain from zeus, if you were making a contract you'd scarifice to the keeper of oaths zeus, quite often in different places.

Jabberwocky
12th August 2006, 10:10
But I do - "retard" is a medical term, not name calling http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/smile.gif

Actually I suffer from tourette syndrome, whanker. I have suffered from this affliction all my life, whanker. I find your lack of understanding contemptible, complete whanker.

AtW
12th August 2006, 10:14
"Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurological disorder characterized by tics -- involuntary, rapid, sudden movements or vocalizations that occur repeatedly in the same way. "

This (if true) should not be affect your judgement that can be inferred from your posts on this board.

While I am sympathetic to anyone suffering from any illness (apart from self-inflicted) it should not be a blank cheque for saying or doing anything: if you can't handle responses on this board then don't post.

Churchill
12th August 2006, 10:24
"Tourette Syndrome (TS) is a neurological disorder characterized by tics -- involuntary, rapid, sudden movements or vocalizations that occur repeatedly in the same way. "

This (if true) should not be affect your judgement that can be inferred from your posts on this board.

While I am sympathetic to anyone suffering from any illness (apart from self-inflicted) it should not be a blank cheque for saying or doing anything: if you can't handle responses on this board then don't post.

Sense of humour required for AtW.

AtW
12th August 2006, 10:24
Sense of humour required for AtW.

You mean he was joking?

Jabberwocky
12th August 2006, 12:30
Errr Whanker.

AtW
12th August 2006, 13:15
Do you have TS or not?

Statistician
12th August 2006, 14:25
Chico was right. God is matematically proven
What is matematics?

Fungus
12th August 2006, 17:38
Are you one of those cockney chaps ? All cock and no balls ?

No but you are a cock and you talk balls.

bogeyman
13th August 2006, 11:58
What is matematics?

Dunno, but it sounds like one of those online dating agencies.

bogeyman
13th August 2006, 12:01
Errr Whanker.

Online Jabberwocky simulator can be found here...

http://www.rathergood.com/touretteaphone/

Almost as offensive as the real thing.