• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Couple problem

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Couple problem

    "Universal Credit IT system can't yet cope with couples

    Universal Credit IT system cannot yet cope with couples or people with children, officials admit

    The computer system used to run Universal Credit cannot cope with the “complicated” lives of thousands of benefits claimants, officials have admitted.

    Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, was forced to deny that the Coalition’s flagship welfare reform is a “debacle” despite officials conceding that the IT system was unable to cope with couples and families.

    Mr Duncan Smith was speaking after he told MPs that more than £40 million spent on IT for the project had already been written off.

    He also admitted that a further £91 million of software would effectively be defunct within the next five years as Universal Credit moves to a digital system.

    Mr Duncan Smith has faced growing criticism over the project, which has been beset by rising costs and delays. "

    Universal Credit IT system can't yet cope with couples - Telegraph

    WTF, they did not know some people are married with children?!?!

    #2
    It's very complicated, you know. Look, the man says so;

    Howard Shiplee, a former Olympics executive...“This sort of software is not something you get on the back of a cigarette packet. It is complicated,” he said.
    Anyway who's invoicing the hundred and umpty million quid?
    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      He also admitted that a further £91 million of software would effectively be defunct within the next five years as Universal Credit moves to a digital system.
      Presumably the current one is analogue, steam powered mayhap? Gucking idiots...
      Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

      Comment


        #4
        Single, no kids, looking for work (or more work, or higher paid work), in rented accommodation. That was the initial criteria for UC in the Pathfinder phase, then it starts to be built up from there, it never was designed for couples.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by anonymouse View Post
          Single, no kids, looking for work (or more work, or higher paid work), in rented accommodation. That was the initial criteria for UC in the Pathfinder phase, then it starts to be built up from there, it never was designed for couples.
          Wot is a 'Pathfinder phase'?

          Is this some newfangled management BS?
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #6
            It's Civil Service speak for "we'll try it in 4 areas in the North West and see what happens". If it works, great, if not we'll tinker with it until it does work.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by anonymouse View Post
              It's Civil Service speak for "we'll try it in 4 areas in the North West and see what happens". If it works, we'll drag it out for every penny we can, if not we'll tinker with it until it we have dragged it out for every penny we can.
              FTFY
              "He's actually ripped" - Jared Padalecki

              https://youtu.be/l-PUnsCL590?list=PL...dNeCyi9a&t=615

              Comment


                #8
                Hope this helps...

                Comment


                  #9
                  The problem wasn't "dragging it out for every penny", the original UC claimant website did get re-written though, this is the second version, the problem is with management and control. Accenture did try to get the thing done on time, at least on the part I was working on, which the Civil Service weren't happy about.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by anonymouse View Post
                    The problem wasn't "dragging it out for every penny", the original UC claimant website did get re-written though, this is the second version, the problem is with management and control. Accenture did try to get the thing done on time, at least on the part I was working on, which the Civil Service weren't happy about.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X