• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Will the loony left rape your daughters?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Will the loony left rape your daughters?

    But they still won't say sorry: Labour's Harman and Dromey finally break their silence over links to paedophile group | Mail Online
    <Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks!

    #2
    Don't forget Margaret Hodge and her input into childrens homes.
    Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.

    No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent.

    Comment


      #3
      No they won't.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        No they won't.
        No but I think the issue is that they were seen to be defending the rights of groups with non conformist sexual orientations, including paedophiles.

        I was looking at some facsimiles of the original legal documents yesterday and there was a clause justifying the proposed lowering of the age of consent to 10 as it could be shown that sex between a child and an adult could sometimes be gratifying for the child.

        Guess whose signature was at the bottom of that?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Gittins Gal View Post
          No but I think the issue is that they were seen to be defending the rights of groups with non conformist sexual orientations, including paedophiles.

          I was looking at some facsimiles of the original legal documents yesterday and there was a clause justifying the proposed lowering of the age of consent to 10 as it could be shown that sex between a child and an adult could sometimes be gratifying for the child.

          Guess whose signature was at the bottom of that?
          I said 'no they won't' because I don't have any daughters and then I get an analysis of non-conformist sexual orientations. Typical CUK tut tut ...
          And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

          Comment


            #6
            Just playing devil's advocate, but exactly what is this person accused of? A link to an organisation?

            Hell I bet I could click a few http links or post a inappropriate comment on twitter and be thrown in please custody.
            "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
              Hell I bet I could click a few http links or post a inappropriate comment on twitter and be thrown in please custody.
              There are better ways to ask for more custard; spell it right to start with.
              And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
                Just playing devil's advocate, but exactly what is this person accused of? A link to an organisation?

                Hell I bet I could click a few http links or post a inappropriate comment on twitter and be thrown in please custody.
                Lobbying for lowering of the age of consent partly on behalf of the Paedophile Information Exchange who were affiliated to the NCCL.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I'm a bit concerned about the accusations. A group lobbying for lowering the age of consent is basically spreading an opinion, and surely they should be free to do that, regardless of how objectionable we might find that opinion. In the current climate, where paedophilia seems to be regarded as one of the worst crimes anyone can commit, I think it's quite scary that people can be accused of being or supporting paedophiles on the basis of expressing an opinion. This is starting to look like a witch hunt.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                    I'm a bit concerned about the accusations. A group lobbying for lowering the age of consent is basically spreading an opinion, and surely they should be free to do that, regardless of how objectionable we might find that opinion. In the current climate, where paedophilia seems to be regarded as one of the worst crimes anyone can commit, I think it's quite scary that people can be accused of being or supporting paedophiles on the basis of expressing an opinion. This is starting to look like a witch hunt.
                    Yes exactly. And I'm no fan of politicians of either colour.
                    "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X