Morning All,
Can anyone of you very clever dev guys give me a steer on this?
We are working with our dev team on canonical data models for use in Biztalk etc.
So we have found that during our mapping session there are two pieces of data needed by downstream systems which we do not store at present.
However the other 40 pieces of data we have are ready to go.
My view is that we should get what we have ready to go and working and add in the two missing fields at a later point when the business have decided what it should contain.
But the dev team say that it takes as much effort to 2 extra fields to the data transfer scheme as it does to add in the first 40.
My view is they are taking the mickey however can I get an unbiased view on this from you lot?
Ta
oPM
Can anyone of you very clever dev guys give me a steer on this?
We are working with our dev team on canonical data models for use in Biztalk etc.
So we have found that during our mapping session there are two pieces of data needed by downstream systems which we do not store at present.
However the other 40 pieces of data we have are ready to go.
My view is that we should get what we have ready to go and working and add in the two missing fields at a later point when the business have decided what it should contain.
But the dev team say that it takes as much effort to 2 extra fields to the data transfer scheme as it does to add in the first 40.
My view is they are taking the mickey however can I get an unbiased view on this from you lot?
Ta
oPM
Comment