Hello,
I'm in a position to take a contract via an agency. The contract in question is in my possession and is very one sided in favor of the agency (no arbitration on points of contention, just immediate contract termination etc). There are also no clauses in there that seem to clarify my position in terms of IR35 - like worker substitution. This is fairly standard (unfortunately) in my experience.
This isn't my first contract, and in the past, I've used contract lawyers at 150/hr to examine and 're-balance' agency contracts with little success. Every agency I've used always flat out rejects any changes even though they've come from a lawyer, and seem reasonable.
Looking back over 10 years, I've not had any success in getting agency contracts changed. My experience echos that described below:
Negotiating a better deal :: Contractor UK
Boiler plate contracts. Agree to them or not at all and go elsewhere.
This raises the question, *how* are contractors implementing IR35 compliance in the real world?
There are no end of guides, forum threads and assessments that will tell you about IR35 and your particular status, but it's all for nothing if the contract your company signed gives the tax man an easy ride.
I also realise that IR35 is based on actual working practices, and not just the contract. OK, so the contract says one thing and you did another that put you outside of IR35. How do you prove this when the tax man comes knocking?
Changing agencies isn't really an option as,
a) Many companies (that I contract for) have preferred agencies or body-shops, and they deal with no one else.
b) Almost all contracts I've seen in the last 10 years have been very one sided in favor of the agency.
If the agency won't budge on their contract details, then I only see one option: Ask the end client to sign a letter confirming they agree to let you ..... substitute, use your own equip etc.... once you're on-site. I don't know many line managers that would go out on such a limb like that for a contractor without good reason. Bit of a gamble IMHO as you've already accepted the contract at that stage.
Very interested to know how others deal with this issue, or if they see it as an issue at all.
Thanks,
I'm in a position to take a contract via an agency. The contract in question is in my possession and is very one sided in favor of the agency (no arbitration on points of contention, just immediate contract termination etc). There are also no clauses in there that seem to clarify my position in terms of IR35 - like worker substitution. This is fairly standard (unfortunately) in my experience.
This isn't my first contract, and in the past, I've used contract lawyers at 150/hr to examine and 're-balance' agency contracts with little success. Every agency I've used always flat out rejects any changes even though they've come from a lawyer, and seem reasonable.
Looking back over 10 years, I've not had any success in getting agency contracts changed. My experience echos that described below:
Negotiating a better deal :: Contractor UK
Boiler plate contracts. Agree to them or not at all and go elsewhere.
This raises the question, *how* are contractors implementing IR35 compliance in the real world?
There are no end of guides, forum threads and assessments that will tell you about IR35 and your particular status, but it's all for nothing if the contract your company signed gives the tax man an easy ride.
I also realise that IR35 is based on actual working practices, and not just the contract. OK, so the contract says one thing and you did another that put you outside of IR35. How do you prove this when the tax man comes knocking?
Changing agencies isn't really an option as,
a) Many companies (that I contract for) have preferred agencies or body-shops, and they deal with no one else.
b) Almost all contracts I've seen in the last 10 years have been very one sided in favor of the agency.
If the agency won't budge on their contract details, then I only see one option: Ask the end client to sign a letter confirming they agree to let you ..... substitute, use your own equip etc.... once you're on-site. I don't know many line managers that would go out on such a limb like that for a contractor without good reason. Bit of a gamble IMHO as you've already accepted the contract at that stage.
Very interested to know how others deal with this issue, or if they see it as an issue at all.
Thanks,
Comment