• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

EU ensuring Farage wins a landslide

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    And no-one believes their manifesto 2019.

    If they had voted for WA the UK would now be stuffed,. A vassal state in limbo. There are only 2 ways forward - remain or no deal. I think the UK now falls into 2 camps. Those that understand that. And those who no longer care - its just too boring.
    If they’d voted for the WA then we’d be out, and have a two year transition period in which to sort out the border and the future relationship. It would be hard work, but achievable.

    Sometimes it’s almost as if Brexiters don’t actually want to leave, they’d just be happier moaning about things.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by meridian View Post
      If they’d voted for the WA then we’d be out, and have a two year transition period in which to sort out the border and the future relationship. It would be hard work, but achievable.

      Sometimes it’s almost as if Brexiters don’t actually want to leave, they’d just be happier moaning about things.
      No way would it be achievable.

      And Brexiters want to leave with no deal. Its the only way.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
        No way would it be achievable.
        Then take 4 years. Or 6. Or 10.

        Is it achievable in any space of time? If so, then set that time and plan for it. Short term pain for long term gain, isn’t it?

        And Brexiters want to leave with no deal. Its the only way.
        So never any deal? No trading relationship except on WTO terms? If that was such a good idea, why isn’t everyone (anyone) trying to get back to basic WTO terms?

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by meridian View Post
          So never any deal? No trading relationship except on WTO terms? If that was such a good idea, why isn’t everyone (anyone) trying to get back to basic WTO terms?
          Whether it is a good idea or not, its the only achievable way for the UK to leave.

          Would it be such a disaster? Many times disasters have been predicted and they have not cone true.

          As Mike Rutherford from Genesis remarked over people leaving Genesis, at the time they all thought it would be disastrous. But actually it worked out well.

          Or to pick another example, Mervyn King writing to the times along with 363 other so called experts to deride the 1981 budget. It worked out quite well....

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
            Whether it is a good idea or not, its the only achievable way for the UK to leave.
            No it’s not. Sign the WA and we’ve left. Easy, and less disruptive than not signing and leaving anyway.


            Would it be such a disaster? Many times disasters have been predicted and they have not cone true.

            As Mike Rutherford from Genesis remarked over people leaving Genesis, at the time they all thought it would be disastrous. But actually it worked out well.

            Or to pick another example, Mervyn King writing to the times along with 363 other so called experts to deride the 1981 budget. It worked out quite well....
            You’re cherry-picking unrelated examples and correlating them to justify something completely different.

            Do you realise how ridiculous that argument sounds?
            “No other country wants to be WTO-only, why is is a good idea for the UK?”
            “Mike Rutherford and Genesis....”

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by meridian View Post
              No it’s not. Sign the WA and we’ve left. Easy, and less disruptive than not signing and leaving anyway.




              You’re cherry-picking unrelated examples and correlating them to justify something completely different.

              Do you realise how ridiculous that argument sounds?
              “No other country wants to be WTO-only, why is is a good idea for the UK?”
              “Mike Rutherford and Genesis....”
              You are right no country, including the UK wants to be on WTO, but WTO is a basis on which to start.

              The UK is not able to negotiate any trade deals whilst still a member of the EU, but after we have left the EU we need trade deals in place. It's the ultimate handcuffs and shackles to the EU. Which came first the chicken or the egg?

              If the EU, as part of the previous 3 years negotiations had accepted that the UK was leaving and allowed the UK to negotiate trade deals that could be enacted upon at the point of leaving we would be in a much better situation post Brexit. But the EU will not allow that to happen, as it would make No-Deal so much easier and that cannot be allowed to happen.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
                You are right no country, including the UK wants to be on WTO, but WTO is a basis on which to start.

                The UK is not able to negotiate any trade deals whilst still a member of the EU, but after we have left the EU we need trade deals in place. It's the ultimate handcuffs and shackles to the EU. Which came first the chicken or the egg?

                If the EU, as part of the previous 3 years negotiations had accepted that the UK was leaving and allowed the UK to negotiate trade deals that could be enacted upon at the point of leaving we would be in a much better situation post Brexit. But the EU will not allow that to happen, as it would make No-Deal so much easier and that cannot be allowed to happen.
                The trade deals Liam Fox has come back with are actually worse than they were before as part of the EU.
                I'm alright Jack

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                  The trade deals Liam Fox has come back with are actually worse than they were before as part of the EU.
                  Yes... but we would not have been part of the EU would we?

                  Which gives many other freedoms.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Yorkie62 View Post
                    You are right no country, including the UK wants to be on WTO, but WTO is a basis on which to start.

                    The UK is not able to negotiate any trade deals whilst still a member of the EU, but after we have left the EU we need trade deals in place. It's the ultimate handcuffs and shackles to the EU. Which came first the chicken or the egg?

                    If the EU, as part of the previous 3 years negotiations had accepted that the UK was leaving and allowed the UK to negotiate trade deals that could be enacted upon at the point of leaving we would be in a much better situation post Brexit. But the EU will not allow that to happen, as it would make No-Deal so much easier and that cannot be allowed to happen.
                    Not “the EU” restricting us from other trade deals. but the terms of the international treaty that we are a part of.

                    Until we leave that treaty, we are bound by it.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by BlasterBates View Post
                      The trade deals Liam Fox has come back with are actually worse than they were before as part of the EU.
                      That is not actually true. A quick search on the internet reveals that all trading agreements currently negotiated are generally aligned to those that currently exist as part of the EU.

                      Brain the size of a planet and I still have to communicate with morons

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X