• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

GBP - How low will it go?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
    But we are not in the pre-EU times anymore... The investment to, all of a sudden, create an entire industry to build those components would be enormous!

    Sent from my ONEPLUS A6000 using Contractor UK Forum mobile app
    OK, but it took time to get to this position as members of the EU, so it will take time to get to a different position.

    Anyway, we've all drifted way off the original subject about the £ exchange rates. Generally the UK populace is much better off now than when £1 = $4. So my contention is that exchange rates in the long term are not that important. In the short term yes, because individuals and companies may suffer as a result of sharp spikes. This country hasn't become bankrupt because the £ is only = $1.2 now.

    Comment


      Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
      OK, but it took time to get to this position as members of the EU, so it will take time to get to a different position.

      Anyway, we've all drifted way off the original subject about the £ exchange rates. Generally the UK populace is much better off now than when £1 = $4. So my contention is that exchange rates in the long term are not that important. In the short term yes, because individuals and companies may suffer as a result of sharp spikes. This country hasn't become bankrupt because the £ is only = $1.2 now.
      You’re the one who takes everything off topic, then when you’ve lost your argument/the plot, you slip back to your old argument.

      You remember before oil went up 2.3x, and since then you suggest that it’s the fault of the EU, such as the 29% inflation you remember, that never happened.

      And since you keep repeating £1 = $4, can you tell me when that was the exchange rate, providing a link to evidence.
      …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

      Comment


        Originally posted by WTFH View Post
        You’re the one who takes everything off topic, then when you’ve lost your argument/the plot, you slip back to your old argument.

        You remember before oil went up 2.3x, and since then you suggest that it’s the fault of the EU, such as the 29% inflation you remember, that never happened.

        And since you keep repeating £1 = $4, can you tell me when that was the exchange rate, providing a link to evidence.
        Save

        So about 1948.

        I wish Zeity was around to tell us about 1860 when £1 would buy you $10. I bet he visited DisneyWorld.....

        Comment


          GBP - How low will it go?

          Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
          Save

          So about 1948.

          I wish Zeity was around to tell us about 1860 when £1 would buy you $10. I bet he visited DisneyWorld..... [emoji57]
          Thanks. So from 1949 until 1971, the pound had a pegged rate of $2.80.
          Before 1949 for a while it was pegged at $4.03, which was unsustainable, hence why it was devalued in 1949.
          After 1971, it was not a pegged rate.

          But it has never been $4 in the last 70 years. I “suggest” that it’s not the EU’s fault that JtB’s memory is faulty and his ability to form a valid logical argument is extremely flawed.
          …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

          Comment


            Originally posted by WTFH View Post
            Thanks. So from 1949 until 1971, the pound had a pegged rate of $2.80.
            Before 1949 for a while it was pegged at $4.03, which was unsustainable, hence why it was devalued in 1949.
            After 1971, it was not a pegged rate.

            But it has never been $4 in the last 70 years. I “suggest” that it’s not the EU’s fault that JtB’s memory is faulty and his ability to form a valid logical argument is extremely flawed.
            So, would you say that we are more or less better off than when £1 = $2.80?

            Comment


              Originally posted by WTFH View Post
              Thanks. So from 1949 until 1971, the pound had a pegged rate of $2.80.
              Before 1949 for a while it was pegged at $4.03, which was unsustainable, hence why it was devalued in 1949.
              After 1971, it was not a pegged rate.

              But it has never been $4 in the last 70 years. I “suggest” that it’s not the EU’s fault that JtB’s memory is faulty and his ability to form a valid logical argument is extremely flawed.
              The old man has a pegged rate of $4.

              Comment


                Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
                The old man has a pegged rate of $4.
                for some considerable time, well before I suspect you were born, 2 shillings and sixpence, i.e. half a crown, was colloquially referred to as half a dollar.

                However, irrespective of the actual rate, and when exactly it was, we are much better of now with £1 = $1.2 than we were then. So I repeat that in the long term, exchange rates are not that relevant. What is relevant is that we compare actual values based on a known criteria, such as how long does it take based on average wages to buy any particular article now as compared with any previous time. Clearly if you apply those criteria to say a TV, then the answer would be that it costs less in real terms now to buy a TV than it did in 1960 for example. I would suggest though that it costs more in real terms now to buy a house than it did in 1960.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
                  So, would you say that we are more or less better off than when £1 = $2.80?
                  That's like asking if we are not better now that pollution is at record levels!!!

                  Btw by the same logic I guess that you are a supporter of staying in the EU, since it's clear we are way (way, wayyyy) better off now than before joining the EU!? It's a very simplistic conclusion, but based on your (very, very simple logic) makes sense...
                  "The boy who cried Sheep"

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by JohntheBike View Post
                    for some considerable time, well before I suspect you were born, 2 shillings and sixpence, i.e. half a crown, was colloquially referred to as half a dollar.

                    However, irrespective of the actual rate, and when exactly it was, we are much better of now with £1 = $1.2 than we were then. So I repeat that in the long term, exchange rates are not that relevant. What is relevant is that we compare actual values based on a known criteria, such as how long does it take based on average wages to buy any particular article now as compared with any previous time. Clearly if you apply those criteria to say a TV, then the answer would be that it costs less in real terms now to buy a TV than it did in 1960 for example. I would suggest though that it costs more in real terms now to buy a house than it did in 1960.
                    I give up!!!

                    Next you gonna give as an example that cost less to take a flight to the US today than in the 60's
                    "The boy who cried Sheep"

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by CryingSheep View Post
                      I give up!!!

                      Next you gonna give as an example that cost less to take a flight to the US today than in the 60's
                      well, you can answer that question yourself. Fine out what the average wage was in 1960 and relate that to the cost of a transatlantic ticket and do the same for today.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X