Originally posted by WTFH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Brexit Party Candidates
Collapse
X
-
I'm alright Jack -
A person could be a voter for Tory, Labour, LibDem, DUP, SNP, PC, SF, or whoever. Their vote was whether they wanted to leave the EU.Originally posted by Zigenare View PostThat's a concept that some of your remoaner mates are struggling with.I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostHe said "could" not "did". We all know a supporter of any party "could" vote to leave, but a certain demographic who support the more extreme segments of parties did vote to leave.
Of course, he was more interested in twisting away from the simple point that it was cross party, and so the negotiations should have been cross party.
Instead, he'd prefer to stick to his usual response of avoid the question, change the subject and accuse others of being the problem.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
-
Originally posted by WTFH View PostYou say it's not fit for purpose, but that's only because it has been bypassed twice in the last 3 years, and never actually used.
You're incorrect in so many ways, the referendum to leave the EU did not have options to vote for different parties. It was a binary question. A person could be a voter for Tory, Labour, LibDem, DUP, SNP, PC, SF, or whoever. Their vote was whether they wanted to leave the EU.
Intelligent Leavers get this. They accept that it should have been a cross-party negotiation team.
Why don't you get it?His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
Originally posted by Mordac View PostDo you mean a cross-party of parties who would die in a ditch before endorsing any sort of Brexit?
No. I mean across all parties with elected MPs in the House of Commons, the idea being to come up with the best solution that satisfies the brevity of the wording of the referendum with the reality of the task.…Maybe we ain’t that young anymoreComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment