Interested if anyone has had their agency bring out an argument to justify their margin that involved how much it cost them to borrow the money needed to pay contractors before they themselves got paid? (i.e they pay monthly for all invoices receded up to the week before regardless of when they get paid by thinned client)
This got trotted out by mine after 6 months when I enquired about a rate raise by them dropping their margin which is around the 15-16% mark.
I didn't want to move at the time so didn't make a big thing of it but it seemed like a strange argument. I'm personally not bothered if they moved me to 60 days payment terms if it meant I got them to drop their cut.
Anyone else seen this?
This got trotted out by mine after 6 months when I enquired about a rate raise by them dropping their margin which is around the 15-16% mark.
I didn't want to move at the time so didn't make a big thing of it but it seemed like a strange argument. I'm personally not bothered if they moved me to 60 days payment terms if it meant I got them to drop their cut.
Anyone else seen this?
Comment