IMO, an amendment to the contract schedule is the "proper" way to address work outside the original contract. Achieving this is obviously harder where an agency is involved.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
"Could you take a quick look at this?" aka DAC during contracts
Collapse
X
-
-
So - looking purely at the questions in the tool, the question is:
"Can the end client move the worker to a different task or project than they originally agreed to do?"
And the 'ideal' answer is "No - that would need to be arranged under a new contract or formal agreement"
Something like "software services" in your schedule, whilst it goes against everything we know about IR35, would allow that question to be answered to put you outside, whereas "Development of the widget management system" would be more restrictive.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Devinity View PostAm wondering how most IT contractors here deal with clients who like to think that they are hiring temporary employee devs who they can get to jump onto different projects as they see fit.
So far, it's been my opinion that from a DAC point of view, for a fixed-length of time contract it's best if I can at least agree up front the project that I will be assigned so that this can go into the assignment schedule, rather than have a more generic "Supplier of development services." or something similar, which seems to me to demonstrate DAC. Do you think it really does make a difference?
That said, even with that in place it's all too easy for someone to pop by your desk when you're there to say that they're in a bind as someone is off sick and could you assist with a particular issue that afternoon / next 2 days. "Could" is not often really a question
What is the best approach to this?
Had you been working in Germany, for example, then the client would have insisted on presenting you with a clear statement of work for that separate thing, or else they would probably fall under the "disguised employment" rules there, meaning that they would have to pay employer's NI (backdated) as well as a penalty provide paid leave and sick pay on top, and probably put in a fixed price for those two days.Comment
-
Depends - act like an awkward tw*t and you won't have a contract to worry about. I've seen it happen.
Yeh of course you've got to draw the line somewhere but, remember, most clients dont get it and really dont want an awkward expensive prima donna sitting there in the corner.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostDepends - act like an awkward tw*t and you won't have a contract to worry about. I've seen it happen.
Yeh of course you've got to draw the line somewhere but, remember, most clients dont get it and really dont want an awkward expensive prima donna sitting there in the corner.Comment
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostDepends - act like an awkward tw*t and you won't have a contract to worry about. I've seen it happen.
Yeh of course you've got to draw the line somewhere but, remember, most clients dont get it and really dont want an awkward expensive prima donna sitting there in the corner.
As you have alluded to, on here, any type of negotiation isn't your strongest point.
I refuse work often, due to this sort of thing, I still get extended so make of that what you will.
You can see a couple of examples earlier in the thread of excuses I have used.
Budgetary
Insurance
Covers most situationsThe Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostIt does depend, indeed, on how you have or present the conversation.
As you have alluded to, on here, any type of negotiation isn't your strongest point.
I refuse work often, due to this sort of thing, I still get extended so make of that what you will.
You can see a couple of examples earlier in the thread of excuses I have used.
Budgetary
Insurance
Covers most situationsComment
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostYou are being unfair and need to understand that contractors operate within a wide range of environments. PC has already been warned that if he refuses work again, his dole will be sanctioned for 6 months, so what do you suggest?Originally posted by psychocandy View Postan awkward expensive prima donna sitting there in the corner.
He may be over valuing exactly what he isThe Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostI believe he needs to take a long hard look at himself.
He may be over valuing exactly what he isComment
-
Only my opinion but....
Contract states "Software development services on system x".
Client says "Can you help out with this issue in an area of system x that you are not currently working on?"
"Sure thing, as long as you are happy with my current task being delayed".
Client says "Can you have a look at this new requirement for system Y to say if its feasible?"
"Sorry but I'm only working on system x, you would have to speak to Mr Bloggs to find out who can look at that"
No D&C and client is happy.
When answering the IR35 question "Can you be moved on to another project" I always interpret it as "If your current project ended and the client asked you to keep busy by cleaning the kitchen, would you have to do it?"
Makes about as much sense as the current rules do.....Last edited by blacjac; 8 March 2017, 14:06.Still InvoicingComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment