Contractor Interviews and Testing? Contractor Interviews and Testing? - Page 2
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Posts 11 to 20 of 49
  1. #11

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    89

    Default

    A first week is always a probation period in fact. No needs to test.

  2. #12

    More time posting than coding

    Snarf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    North West
    Posts
    353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by t0bytoo View Post
    I've seen two types of tests: good ones and bad ones.

    Good ones involved sitting down with an exercise that reasonably reflects the type of work I'd expect to do. Usually quite fun to do as an exercise.

    Bad ones come in the form of some lazy instructions and/or irrelevant computer science related algorithms that I usually don't understand and never bother doing.

    The tests are to help the client know a bit about how you work and - importantly - for you to get a sense of how the client works. If the test is nonsense, the work will be nonsense - walk away!. If the test is interesting and followed up by a discussion about implementation, scalability, etc, that's useful.

    I don't think that anything created in a test has any commercial value, so I wouldn't worry about that.
    Fizz buzz

  3. #13

    Ddraig Goch


    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Cymru
    Posts
    10,018

    Default

    Best gigs - ones secured via friendly chat.
    Crap gigs - one involving multiple interviews and/or tests.
    Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!

  4. #14

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    38,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FK1 View Post
    A first week is always a probation period in fact. No needs to test.
    Rubbish. What about all the time and effort taken finding/interviewing/onboarding to meet timelines? You get someone in without proper diligence and bin them a week later puts the project back and costs money.

    Granted a poorly done tech test isn't a good way to find the right candidate but just trialing expensive contractors for a week isn't the way to go either.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

  5. #15

    Still gathering requirements...


    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    Rubbish. What about all the time and effort taken finding/interviewing/onboarding to meet timelines? You get someone in without proper diligence and bin them a week later puts the project back and costs money.

    Granted a poorly done tech test isn't a good way to find the right candidate but just trialing expensive contractors for a week isn't the way to go either.
    The first week is always a probation period in fact. Nobody trusts you because of interview stage tests and nobody will pay you until you deliver working things.

    Real life working tasks take days. 1-2 hours tests just check interview skills and nothing more.
    In the context of a contract for services it is a non-sense. In the context of a senior level specialist with a working history it is a disgrace.

    Any fear of fake could be treated with a few minutes on the Companies House web-site. Like a credit check.

  6. #16

    My post count is Majestic

    northernladuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    38,879

    Default

    Words fail me.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

  7. #17

    Godlike

    BR14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Under your kitchen sink
    Posts
    6,031

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    Words fail me.
    ummmmm................... yeh
    Entropy is NOT what it used to be.
    Inertia, however........................

  8. #18

    Super poster

    Hobosapien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    LA - la la fantasy land
    Posts
    2,466

    Default

    Any feedback on what types of interview to expect depending on role?

    Surely analysis/architecture/management and other senior roles rely more on scenario based questions than crappy technical tests about syntax and other bollox that are often just memory tests not competence tests.

    Reason for asking is I'm considering moving up the chain now I'm 'senior' so can rely on my experience rather than memory and not constantly having to learn the latest crappy frameworks or tools the code monkeys love tangling with. Much easier to sit in meetings/workshops and knock up a few documents/presentations where the hardest task is avoiding eating too much cake.
    Maybe tomorrow, I'll want to settle down. Until tomorrow, I'll just keep moving on.

  9. #19

    Double Godlike!

    malvolio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Walking in the garden, dreaming of Olivia...
    Posts
    11,216

    Default

    Yeah, dead easy - until you're in charge of a £10m budget and people's livelihoods.
    For example - "Here's a 300 page ITT for an outsourcing deal. How do we make a profit on it and undercut our competition. You have three days to come up with a costed proposal..."

    Successful senior architects and similar don't get paid good money for talking, they have to deliver difficult and often complicated solutions aginst demanding constraints. If it was easy, everyone would do it.
    Blog? What blog...?

  10. #20

    Super poster

    Hobosapien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    LA - la la fantasy land
    Posts
    2,466

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by malvolio View Post
    Yeah, dead easy - until you're in charge of a £10m budget and people's livelihoods.
    For example - "Here's a 300 page ITT for an outsourcing deal. How do we make a profit on it and undercut our competition. You have three days to come up with a costed proposal..."

    Successful senior architects and similar don't get paid good money for talking, they have to deliver difficult and often complicated solutions aginst demanding constraints. If it was easy, everyone would do it.

    Fair point, but how do chancers get weeded out at interview for such roles?

    I'd expect if the CV is relatively honest then those asked for interview will have relevant experience and will be able to do the job, so it's down to the agency/recruiter checking the facts accurately to not put inappropriate candidates forward in the first place.

    Just need to know one's limits and seek out appropriate opportunities then convince the client/employer you can do what's going to be asked. How the client/employer goes about that task is where the interesting differences in approach lie that I and others are probably interested to hear for future interviews.
    Maybe tomorrow, I'll want to settle down. Until tomorrow, I'll just keep moving on.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •