Originally posted by jamesbrown
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Substitution and IR35
Collapse
X
-
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!! -
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostCouple of thoughts here. For a start, you aren't sending someone else, you are sending an additional resource. You can't do it so it's not someone else. Maybe that's where you are tripping yourself up.
So now we have nearly finished defining the meaning of the two words.. Of course you need a contract with your sub. They work for you. Would you work at your client with no contract? Clue is in the name of what we are. You'll also need something from the client to agree the extra costs and scope of the work.
How you work with your sub is up to you but you represent them to the client and you are responsible ultimately but up to you how diligent you are.
Have you thought how you are going to do all this? Have you got the time and the means to go try find a contractor and get all the legal documents and contracts together to get them on board? Are you going to be able to find one that can only work for the time you need? If it's only a couple of weeks it's a lot of work for little back. If it is a short gig I'm not surprised the client can't be bothered resourcing it and happy to palm it to you. Could be a right pain. Unless there is a pretty good financial outcome for you here it could be a lot more effort than it is worth. Have you run the numbers to see what you'll be getting out of it?
Another thing. Client giving you extra work above and beyond the Statement of Work you are already contracted to do (You do have one of those don't you) sounds very much like Direction and Control to me. You need to be careful your working practices are IR35 safe. This does give you an opportunity for some good IR35 defense as you are working like a business but if could uncover other situations where you are just being given work like a permie. In this instance you can subcontract, great, but are there other instances where you've just accepted other work? Just be wary.
Yes I have agreement from client re additional costs and yes I’ve run the numbers.
Yes I have a SoW with the client, of course. I was always free to decline the additional work as out of scope. I am no way subjected to SDC. I do not just accept ‘work’ from the client. In this instance I was asked could I do it and if not could I sort someone else to do it.Comment
-
Originally posted by jamesbrown View PostFirst, I would forget about IR35. That is the tail wagging the dog.
Second, I would look at your contract with the client. It may have separate clauses on subcontracting and substitution. It may be silent about one or both. Then there's the reality of whether the client will stick to the contractual terms or has room to interpret them differently. For example, with a Right of Substitution, that right could be fettered in some way that makes it difficulty to achieve in practice (e.g. "client reserves the right to reject a sub because they smell").
Third, work out what sort of relationship you want between the three parties. Subcontracting is more flexible and, in that case, the client may have no idea that it is even happening (again, the contract will probably regulate what happens, such as "no assigning or subcontracting without prior approval"). If you both want a bum-on-seat representative of YourCo working on the client site, then that is substitution (assuming they are doing work that you would otherwise do).
As I say, forget about IR35. Your question is a question about what makes sense from a business POV.
Just make sure that you stick to the contract with your client and that you don't lose money (and/or face).
My contract with the client has a substitute clause but is silent on subcontracting. I think your point about the relationship of the three parties is important and what I’ll focus on.Comment
-
Originally posted by AdeleLaptop View PostYes I’ve found the sub and yes I’ve time to sort the documentation.
Yes I have agreement from client re additional costs and yes I’ve run the numbers.
Yes I have a SoW with the client, of course. I was always free to decline the additional work as out of scope. I am no way subjected to SDC. I do not just accept ‘work’ from the client. In this instance I was asked could I do it and if not could I sort someone else to do it.
If you can get this extra resource in you are already most of the way there, just maybe change the clients view with them and start to look at the future portfolio to ring fence future work rather than them asking you to do this and that. Move to an over arching contract and bill per piece of work? You take on a client relationship/sales hat as well as a contractor on the ground?
Or are you already there with the client coming to you to resource more work?'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostBut it's not. It's extra work the OP can't do.Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostSounds like you are in a good place then. If your relationship is so good with the client is there any opportunity to change your whole engagement with the client from a T&M contractor style to a more managed service and proactively chase work?
If you can get this extra resource in you are already most of the way there, just maybe change the clients view with them and start to look at the future portfolio to ring fence future work rather than them asking you to do this and that. Move to an over arching contract and bill per piece of work? You take on a client relationship/sales hat as well as a contractor on the ground?
Or are you already there with the client coming to you to resource more work?Comment
-
Originally posted by AdeleLaptop View PostFirst time client has done this. You make some great points I’m going to give plenty of thought to. Thanks!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladyuk View PostFirst time he has done this.Comment
-
'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostEven a broken clock is right twice a dayComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment