Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
What's good about that? They just participate in employment law avoidance. If they want employee, they should look for an employee.
Try reading what I said. The rate is a good rate for the location.
The IR35 status could have been assessed properly - you have no clue as to whether they've used the EST tool or not. No substitution for starters, I'd expect.
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist
Try reading what I said. The rate is a good rate for the location.
The IR35 status could have been assessed properly - you have no clue as to whether they've used the EST tool or not. No substitution for starters, I'd expect.
It's how you write the contract - there are few rules how to make it "inside" to avoid employment law and remove the risk of HMRC investigation. The CEST is just to confirm you got it "right".
I thought one is paid for the work done and not where is located?
Comment