• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Epidemiologist role

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Epidemiologist role

    Help us* in the fight against Covid-19.

    Epidemiologist

    *It's Inside IR35 so we're gonna shaft you on tax.

    qh
    He had a negative bluety on a quackhandle and was quadraspazzed on a lifeglug.

    I look forward to your all knowing and likely sarcastic and unhelpful reply.


    #2
    Originally posted by quackhandle View Post
    Help us* in the fight against Covid-19.

    Epidemiologist

    *It's Inside IR35 so we're gonna shaft you on tax.

    qh
    It may be inside but they've reflected that in a very good rate for the location.
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
      It may be inside but they've reflected that in a very good rate for the location.
      What's good about that? They just participate in employment law avoidance. If they want employee, they should look for an employee.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
        What's good about that? They just participate in employment law avoidance. If they want employee, they should look for an employee.
        Try reading what I said. The rate is a good rate for the location.

        The IR35 status could have been assessed properly - you have no clue as to whether they've used the EST tool or not. No substitution for starters, I'd expect.
        The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
          Try reading what I said. The rate is a good rate for the location.

          The IR35 status could have been assessed properly - you have no clue as to whether they've used the EST tool or not. No substitution for starters, I'd expect.
          It's how you write the contract - there are few rules how to make it "inside" to avoid employment law and remove the risk of HMRC investigation. The CEST is just to confirm you got it "right".

          I thought one is paid for the work done and not where is located?

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
            I thought one is paid for the work done and not where is located?
            'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
              Who will rid us of this troublesome sockie?

              Comment

              Working...
              X