Hi,
I'm having a dilema that I need someone with a different perpective.
I applied, interviewed and presented for a 6 month contract as a Vendor Manager with a Tech Manufacturer (1 hour commte from home). During the interview I demonstrated how I worked, my approach, how I work with suppliers to get the best from them and was given very positive feedback. Indeed I was offered the role before I had left the car park. However...I have been here two weeks and it has transpired that the role is very different from the one I thought I was walking into. Still working in a back-office function, but the role is a task-based role, not a strategic one; a role which requires me to be "..at your desk all the time...", "...you won't need to visit suppliers..." all the reverse of how I left the interview.
Now it could be thought that I ran a bad interview, didn't ask the right questions, my counter-argument to that is the fact I presented my approach. The way I work. I'm not sure I could have been clearer. I am not happy here - at all.
I should add, at this point, that during the interview, a Director told me that "...if you think that you might leave before the end then remember this is a small world and we WILL bump into one another..." Basically a not very well veiled threat.
So, my dilemma:
I have another contract available, pays a slightly higher rate, closer to home. Performing (I think) closer activities to my skill set with (I know) much greater autonomy. I am VERY tempted to leave this contract (following the notice period) and move. What do you think? Would this be so wrong?
I'm having a dilema that I need someone with a different perpective.
I applied, interviewed and presented for a 6 month contract as a Vendor Manager with a Tech Manufacturer (1 hour commte from home). During the interview I demonstrated how I worked, my approach, how I work with suppliers to get the best from them and was given very positive feedback. Indeed I was offered the role before I had left the car park. However...I have been here two weeks and it has transpired that the role is very different from the one I thought I was walking into. Still working in a back-office function, but the role is a task-based role, not a strategic one; a role which requires me to be "..at your desk all the time...", "...you won't need to visit suppliers..." all the reverse of how I left the interview.
Now it could be thought that I ran a bad interview, didn't ask the right questions, my counter-argument to that is the fact I presented my approach. The way I work. I'm not sure I could have been clearer. I am not happy here - at all.
I should add, at this point, that during the interview, a Director told me that "...if you think that you might leave before the end then remember this is a small world and we WILL bump into one another..." Basically a not very well veiled threat.
So, my dilemma:
I have another contract available, pays a slightly higher rate, closer to home. Performing (I think) closer activities to my skill set with (I know) much greater autonomy. I am VERY tempted to leave this contract (following the notice period) and move. What do you think? Would this be so wrong?
Comment