• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BBC article on micro-Ltds

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by oliverson View Post
    Except you forgot to mention that dividends come from profits, which have corporation tax applied to them, currently at 19%, before then having dividend tax applied at 7.5% (lower rate)
    The contractors I know also don't pay themselves 30k to be @ 7.5% after corp tax, but much more, therefore their tax bills are substantial.

    If they believe contractors pay not enough tax, then there should be a better way to do it - for example increase the dividend tax, so it will match PAYE plus employers NI by pound

    Improve PAYE so it is as easy to get a salary as dividend.

    Lastly, merge income tax with NI.

    I already listed three better ideas. Me detective mind tells me, the tax is not the reason IR35 is pushed through.

    This is the same thing as talking about children safety when implementing censorship.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by oliverson View Post
      Except you forgot to mention that dividends come from profits, which have corporation tax applied to them, currently at 19%, before then having dividend tax applied at 7.5% (lower rate)
      It has, yes, but that's the company's money, not the directors. And any portion paid out as salary does not attract CT.

      Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
      The contractors I know also don't pay themselves 30k to be @ 7.5% after corp tax, but much more, therefore their tax bills are substantial.
      In that case, the 3 year Dividend Charge would be less, if not zero.

      I still think expecting to be taxed a a shareholder but get benefits as an employee is not right.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by oliverson View Post
        Except you forgot to mention that dividends come from profits, which have corporation tax applied to them, currently at 19%, before then having dividend tax applied at 7.5% (lower rate)
        I think you are focussing on the wrong part here, Limited Companies do still get an advantage through DIV instead of PAYE

        To make calcs easier I've assumed you paid a base salary of £12,500 and a DIVI of £2k already (the tax free DIVIDEND)

        So you wanted to disperse 20K of money to your employee (you) then there is a difference

        PAYE

        Income Tax 20% - £4,000
        Employee NI 12% - £2,400
        Employer NI 13.8% - £2,760

        Total to GOV = £9,160

        DIVIDEND ROUTE

        Corp Tax 19% - £3,800
        Dividend Tax 7.5% - £1,500

        Total to GOV £5,300

        NOW - If you were to argue that due to lack of sick pay, holiday pay, pension contributions and other benefits that the difference wasn't that great I'd agree, but on a pure TAX TAKE discussion there is a massive difference that gives contractors a big boost in raw take home cash (but no holiday/sick/benefits etc - so quickly eroded)

        Comment


          #14
          Are you sure self-employed people pay double-NI? The comparison between SE and Ltd-divi is surely the more relevant one... also it would be useful to run it at low-ish income (say £25k gross), medium (50k?) and high (100k).

          If I get time I'll run it but SE isn't an area I ever used.
          Originally posted by MaryPoppins
          I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
          Originally posted by vetran
          Urine is quite nourishing

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by oilboil View Post
            NOW - If you were to argue that due to lack of sick pay, holiday pay, pension contributions and other benefits that the difference wasn't that great I'd agree, but on a pure TAX TAKE discussion there is a massive difference that gives contractors a big boost in raw take home cash (but no holiday/sick/benefits etc - so quickly eroded)
            Why don't you compare real life values? For example 70k salary versus 70k revenue (minus accounting, insurance, office, equipment and other costs)?

            Such comparisons like yours are unhelpful and give people wrong image.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
              Why don't you compare real life values? For example 70k salary versus 70k revenue (minus accounting, insurance, office, equipment and other costs)?

              Such comparisons like yours are unhelpful and give people wrong image.
              Are they, because they are exactly my current real world example having taken many months of this year. How about you try to stop thinking that everyone is like you

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by oilboil View Post
                I think you are focussing on the wrong part here, Limited Companies do still get an advantage through DIV instead of PAYE

                To make calcs easier I've assumed you paid a base salary of £12,500 and a DIVI of £2k already (the tax free DIVIDEND)

                So you wanted to disperse 20K of money to your employee (you) then there is a difference

                PAYE

                Income Tax 20% - £4,000
                Employee NI 12% - £2,400
                Employer NI 13.8% - £2,760

                Total to GOV = £9,160

                DIVIDEND ROUTE

                Corp Tax 19% - £3,800
                Dividend Tax 7.5% - £1,500

                Total to GOV £5,300

                NOW - If you were to argue that due to lack of sick pay, holiday pay, pension contributions and other benefits that the difference wasn't that great I'd agree, but on a pure TAX TAKE discussion there is a massive difference that gives contractors a big boost in raw take home cash (but no holiday/sick/benefits etc - so quickly eroded)
                Your final para is the balancing part of the equation.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by elsergiovolador View Post
                  Why don't you compare real life values? For example 70k salary versus 70k revenue (minus accounting, insurance, office, equipment and other costs)?

                  Such comparisons like yours are unhelpful and give people wrong image.
                  You think everyone running a Ltd has gross profit/billing of £70k?!

                  Speaking of real life, you might like to visit the real world...
                  Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                  I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                  Originally posted by vetran
                  Urine is quite nourishing

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by DSF70 View Post
                    Your final para is the balancing part of the equation.
                    Self-employed do not get sick pay or holiday pay or pension contributions either.
                    Originally posted by MaryPoppins
                    I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
                    Originally posted by vetran
                    Urine is quite nourishing

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by oilboil View Post
                      Are they, because they are exactly my current real world example having taken many months of this year. How about you try to stop thinking that everyone is like you
                      In that case do you think you should pay as much tax as employee, given you don't get the same benefits?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X