• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Westminter child abuse enquiry cover up

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Westminter child abuse enquiry cover up

    Lets appoint a judge BBC News - Ex-senior judge Butler-Sloss to head child sex abuse inquiry whose husband has sex with young girls Cleveland Judge Elilzabeth Butler-Sloss Sex Scandal

    #2
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    about right ...

    stupid or malevolent?
    Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by vetran View Post
      about right ...

      stupid or malevolent?
      It was naively suggested that MPs did their jobs to benefit others. the more of this sort of stuff we see the more evident it is that the people in power are driven by self interest above anything else.
      Every single one of them should be uncovered and punished accordingly
      Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

      Comment


        #4
        The thing that gets me, assuming this is all true, is that the current shower are just as bad in that they all know about it (apparently all these allegations are common knowledge in the Westminster bubble) yet nobody has ever done anything about it with the exception of Tom Watson and Simon Danzcuk.

        So how in God's name are we expected to believe their repeated mantras of immigration and membership of the EU being good for Britain. I feel that this could snowball and if it goes as far as plenty of sources in the alternative media seem to think it does then this will be a game changer.

        However, it looks like this inquiry has far too broad a remit and the wheels will grind interminably slowly and all the revulsion currently being felt by the general public will eventually be snuffed out.

        Comment


          #5
          There seems to be quite alot of preserving the status quo.

          Look at the economy. The only things keeping it going are immigration and house prices fueled by help to buy. Benefits no-one but the old and rich. But politicians want to postpone the day of reckoning for as long as possible.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
            It was naively suggested that MPs did their jobs to benefit others. the more of this sort of stuff we see the more evident it is that the people in power are driven by self interest above anything else.
            Every single one of them should be uncovered and punished accordingly
            I used to think that some MPs were OK, many bad, a bit of a tendency towards venality and corruption by power. But now I am starting to think David Icke is correct and they are mostly eternal vampire spirits in reptilian form, who prey on Earth children. Andy Coulson was obviously incompatible with the metamorphosis processing so had to be ejected.
            The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

            George Frederic Watts

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by speling bee View Post
              I used to think that some MPs were OK, many bad, a bit of a tendency towards venality and corruption by power. But now I am starting to think David Icke is correct and they are mostly eternal vampire spirits in reptilian form, who prey on Earth children. Andy Coulson was obviously incompatible with the metamorphosis processing so had to be ejected.
              Well some of those dots are starting to join up.

              Comment


                #8
                Dunno about the husband stuff: it's attributed to the News of the World in 1988, which isn't really a reliable source; and all the sites hosting it seem to be conspiracy sites. Also, Scourer, hasn't F4J got a bit of a beef with her? EDIT: she did say she was sorry: BBC News - Baroness Butler-Sloss sorry for Fathers4Justice 'death threat' claim

                She's the sister of Thatcher's Attorney General, it seems. I think we all know how I feel about that gang of thugs.

                So which should I be more concerned about when considering her fitness for the job: her brother's activities, or her husband's?

                Or are we now allowed to judge a woman on her own merits, given that it's 2014 and they're allowed to vote and own property and all kinds of tulip like that?
                Last edited by NickFitz; 9 July 2014, 00:46. Reason: Link to F4J apology

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by NickFitz View Post
                  Dunno about the husband stuff: it's attributed to the News of the World in 1988, which isn't really a reliable source; and all the sites hosting it seem to be conspiracy sites. Also, Scourer, hasn't F4J got a bit of a beef with her? EDIT: she did say she was sorry: BBC News - Baroness Butler-Sloss sorry for Fathers4Justice 'death threat' claim

                  She's the sister of Thatcher's Attorney General, it seems. I think we all know how I feel about that gang of thugs.

                  So which should I be more concerned about when considering her fitness for the job: her brother's activities, or her husband's?

                  Or are we now allowed to judge a woman on her own merits, given that it's 2014 and they're allowed to vote and own property and all kinds of tulip like that?
                  Men are regularly judged on what their wives get up to. So I don't see that being male or female matters.

                  1988 was pre internet. Electromagnetism is hosted by Ivor Catt who was involved heavily in the Sinclair C5 - hardly a conspiracy site. Clearly the story was published.

                  As for f4j, she has published some stuff that was very pro father.

                  She fits in with the establishment. She will make sure no stone is left unturned - the evidence will then be buried under a larger stone.

                  More concerning, abuse is probably still going on today. The system will be protected.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
                    Men are regularly judged on what their wives get up to. So I don't see that being male or female matters.

                    1988 was pre internet. Electromagnetism is hosted by Ivor Catt who was involved heavily in the Sinclair C5 - hardly a conspiracy site. Clearly the story was published.

                    As for f4j, she has published some stuff that was very pro father.

                    She fits in with the establishment. She will make sure no stone is left unturned - the evidence will then be buried under a larger stone.

                    More concerning, abuse is probably still going on today. The system will be protected.
                    Ivor Catt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

                    Writings and opinions[edit]
                    On electromagnetism[edit]
                    Catt argues that much of mainstream electromagnetism is wrong: Catt does not entertain the existence of electric charge as a fundamental entity and he claims that all charge is composed of trapped Heaviside energy current. He argues that capacitance and inductance are fictional, being artifacts of the transmission-line nature of the devices; that displacement current is not needed to explain capacitor operation. As opposed to normal electric current (flow of charge), Catt uses energy current to describe most effects.

                    On industrial management[edit]
                    Catt spent six years in the 1960s working in five different electronic companies in the USA. He was very disillusioned by his experience and wrote a harsh critique of American management practices in his book, The Catt Concept: The New Industrial Darwinism. Catt was critical of the hire and fire culture, which he labeled the New Social Darwinism, and accused American employers of stifling their workers' creativity.[8] The book got largely negative reviews, with Kirkus Reviews describing it as a contrived and often muddled work that rested on "one man's bitter and limited experience."[9] Published in six languages.

                    On the English justice system[edit]
                    In Catt's view the English justice system is heading to a collapse. He assigns the blame to Lord Denning, who according to Catt replaced the rule of law by desire for equity, ethics and righteousness. Catt also accuses radical feminists and anti-social women of causing the disintegration of the justice system and reducing divorced fathers to helots, through their control of the media and the courts.[10][11][12] Catt discusses his views on the issue in his self-published book, The Hook and the Sting: The Legal Mafia.

                    Current status of Catt's ideas[edit]
                    Catt's paper 'Crosstalk (Noise) in Digital Systems,' in IEEE Trans. on Elect. Comp., vol. EC-16 (December 1967) pp. 749–58 [1] has so far received 44 scholarly citations [2], while two other popular papers written by Ivor Catt received 88 [3] and 28 [4] scholarly citations, respectively.

                    Catt also claimed disastrous consequences of what he calls censorship (by which he means, scientific journals declining to publish his papers) in an article in Electronics World September 2003 issue, 'EMC - A Fatally Flawed Discipline' pages 44–52:

                    ... during the Falklands War, the British warship HMS Sheffield had to switch off its radar looking for incoming missiles ... This is why it did not see incoming Exocet missiles, and you know the rest. How was it that after decades of pouring money into the EMC community, this could happen ... that community has gone into limbo, sucking in money but evading the real problems, like watching for missiles while you talk to HQ.

                    His work has received coverage and debate in the magazines Wireless World and Electronics World from December 1978 to September 1988, also see [5]. The New Scientist on 19 February 1989 stated that Catt proposed an electronic internet to share ideas and circumvent bigoted censorship [6]:

                    Catt argues that as bodies of knowledge grow, they become stronger in keeping out any new items of knowledge that appear to question the fundamental base of the established knowledge and its practitioners. To assist the propagation of new ideas, he proposes the creation of an electronic information-sharing network.
                    The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

                    George Frederic Watts

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X