World war 3 now imminent

[AtW]

The point is there will not be another genocide. Big wars, ethnic cleansing and Anti-semitism is what White Europeans are good at, not Iranians or Arabs. They have lived in the middle east with Arabs/Muslims for 1,000s of years. I'm also surprised Israel has not used a Nuke but for different reasons. I guess that shows you are surprised the Israelis wouldn't mind killing millions of civilians....

Israel is a small country - a few nukes there would be equivalent to genocide, something for understandable reasons Israel does not want to find out.

Ayatollahs should have been eliminated back in 80s, with tactical nukes if necessary - that would have saved millions of people, Iranians in the first instance - just like nukes saved Japan from much worse fate.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

Israel is a small country - a few nukes there would be equivalent to genocide, something for understandable reasons Israel does not want to find out.

Ayatollahs should have been eliminated back in 80s, with tactical nukes if necessary - that would have saved millions of people, Iranians in the first instance - just like nukes saved Japan from much worse fate.

Oh wow. I didn't think you were a proponent of genocide or it would be possible you would stoop to the point of justifying the usage of Nuclear weapons. If what you say stands then what you are accusing the Iranians of being willing to do is also justifiable - they see Israel as an aggressor wanting to take all the land between the Nile and Euphrates. Luckily for all of us the Iranians are moral people and the religious establishment has made it clear that the use of Nuclear weapons would never be justifiable (that includes the ones you would consider extremists). Iran would never use a Nuclear weapon but I'm starting to think they may need one as a deterrent to Israel/USA. Of course that doesn't take into account the fact that practically they couldn't Nuke it because they have lots of "Proxies" either inside or close to Israel.

[AtW]

Tactical nukes against legit targets - military or political leadership of enemy state isn’t genocide: they dug into deep bunkers and tactical nukes might be the only way to get them when inevitably it becomes necessary.

Bush made one mistake - he should have dealt with Iran, instead of Iraq, or both.

Sadly Trump is too dumb to deal with now very dangerous enemy of the West like Iran.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

Tactical nukes against legit targets - military or political leadership of enemy state isn’t genocide: they dug into deep bunkers and tactical nukes might be the only way to get them when inevitably it becomes necessary.

Bush made one mistake - he should have dealt with Iran, instead of Iraq, or both.

Sadly Trump is too dumb to deal with now very dangerous enemy of the West like Iran.

You see Iran as dangerous, they view the USA/Israel as very dangerous and given:
1) the US terrorist attack
2) Unilateral withdrawal from the nuclear treaty
3) Surrounding Iran on every side
4) Support for Syrian "Rebels"
etc.
you could easily argue they are justified in doing so.

It is quite shocking that anybody could even mention a nuke being justifiable (tactical or otherwise).

[AtW]

It’s a pity you were not born in Iran, alongside with all other useful Mor Ons

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

Perhaps so, it is a great country.

[AtW]

Perhaps so, it is a great country.

Are you wearing your MIGA hat now?

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

Are you wearing your MIGA hat now?

No need. It's already Great.

[AtW]

No need. It's already Great.

Well it won’t be soon unless people of Iran kick out ayatollahs ASAP.

Hopefully US/UK and allies will provide air support necessary.

[NorthWestPerm2Contr]

Well it won’t be soon unless people of Iran kick out ayatollahs ASAP.

Hopefully US/UK and allies will provide air support necessary.

Their support is stronger than ever and will only get stronger now. Good luck with that.